How the New York Times Magazine Botched Its Iran Story
None of us was taking the Obama administrations word for it on the Iran nuclear deal.
By Joe Cirincione
May 09, 2016
A devious president and his top aides trick the nation into a dangerous foreign entanglement with the help of a gullible press corps and complicit experts. George W. Bush and war with Iraq? No, Barack Obama and diplomacy with Iran. At least according to David Samuels telling in an instantly controversial article for this past Sundays New York Times Magazine about White House adviser Ben Rhodes.
Rhodes, whom I know, is very talented, but he is no modern-day Rasputin casting a spell over Obama, the press and public. The truth is that Samuels used his access to Rhodes to attack a deal he never liked and publicly campaigned against.
In his article, Samuels claims Obama was actively misleading the public about Iran. He says the president made up a story of how the 2013 election of pragmatic Iranian President Hassan Rouhani created a new opening with Iran. This, so Obama could win broad public currency for the thought that there was a significant split in the regime. This, in turn, claims Samuels, allowed Obama to avoid a divisive but clarifying debate of the actual policy choices and eliminate the fuss about Irans nuclear program so that Obama could pursue his real agenda: a large-scale disengagement from the Middle East.
Every element of this thesis falls apart under scrutiny...
Read more:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/2016-new-york-times-magazine-david-samuels-ben-rhodes-iran-nuclear-deal-213880#ixzz48DriuBEz
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook