Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Kubrick Site: The Case For HAL's Sanity by Clay Waldrop
http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/amk/doc/0095.htmlIntroduction
Some viewers of Stanley Kubrick's film "2001: A Space Odyssey" have theorized that HAL, the computer genius turned villain of the spaceship Discovery, went mad during the Jupiter mission. However there is an alternative theory: that HAL acted rationally and logically, indeed with cold, calculating precision befitting a machine of his intelligence. This alternative theory will be presented here, with supporting evidence.
Before proceeding, let us acknowledge that Arthur C. Clarke, in his sequel novel "2010: Odyssey Two" says (in effect) that HAL went mad due to conflict in his programming. However, the 2001 novelization and its sequels differ in many respects from Kubrick's movie, so I will exclude them from my examination, and refer exclusively to the movie for evidence
The Chess Game
The first piece of evidence arises from the chess game between Frank Poole and HAL. The initial position shown on the computer screen is:
Some viewers of Stanley Kubrick's film "2001: A Space Odyssey" have theorized that HAL, the computer genius turned villain of the spaceship Discovery, went mad during the Jupiter mission. However there is an alternative theory: that HAL acted rationally and logically, indeed with cold, calculating precision befitting a machine of his intelligence. This alternative theory will be presented here, with supporting evidence.
Before proceeding, let us acknowledge that Arthur C. Clarke, in his sequel novel "2010: Odyssey Two" says (in effect) that HAL went mad due to conflict in his programming. However, the 2001 novelization and its sequels differ in many respects from Kubrick's movie, so I will exclude them from my examination, and refer exclusively to the movie for evidence
The Chess Game
The first piece of evidence arises from the chess game between Frank Poole and HAL. The initial position shown on the computer screen is:
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1200 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Kubrick Site: The Case For HAL's Sanity by Clay Waldrop (Original Post)
Baobab
May 2016
OP
longship
(40,416 posts)1. What a pack of rubbish!
Blah, blah, blah-de-blah, de-blah, de-blah.
It's fiction. And Clarke already stated clearly what his intent was, in subsequent novels. Mumbo-jumbo like this article are therefore just tiresome made up shit.
msongs
(67,365 posts)2. let's ask HAL for his opinion....
bemildred
(90,061 posts)3. I think the programming error is this: thinking it is "foolproof and incapable of error".
That will always lead to contradiction.