Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Post removed
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed (Original Post)
Post removed
Jun 2016
OP
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)1. Careful. Facts are sometimes frowned upon here. n/t
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)2. Fact is a moving target of late.
Off the to the greatest. May it grow legs.
msongs
(73,237 posts)3. its old news even on du nt
pnwmom
(110,217 posts)4. So some SS agent finds a way to make big bucks off of his access to the Clintons.
And there's no way to judge how much his story is just right wing mud, or whether there's truth in any of it.
And this seems fair to you?
How is any First Family supposed to let the Secret Service close enough to guard them, knowing that any one of them could turn around and try to write a lurid, fiction filled best seller, based on their work in the S.S.? How is any First Family supposed to defend themselves from this kind of attack?
Shame on anyone who helps to lob these "bombshells" on a Democratic site.
elleng
(141,926 posts)5. 2 articles.
Let the reader decide.
