Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 03:46 PM Jun 2016

Al Qaeda to jihadis: ‘Target white Americans, avoid minorities

"Al Qaeda to jihadis: ‘Target white Americans, avoid minorities, because US mislabels attacks as ‘hate crime’"

Foreign Desk
http://www.foreigndesknews.com/world/us/al-qaeda-jihadis-target-white-americans-avoid-minorities-us-mislabels-attacks-hate-crime/
By: Lisa Daftari
Jun 24, 2016 4:14pm

Al Qaeda of the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) has published a guide urging jihadis to carry out more ‘lone wolf’ operations in the U.S. following the deadly terror attack in Orlando earlier this month and to set their sights on the targeting of white Americans.

The publication, “Inspire guide: Orlando operation,” which seeks to capitalize on the terror attack carried out by gunman Omar Mateen who pledged allegiance to ISIS, plainly encourages extremists to attack Americans.

While Mateen chose to target what the guide refers to as a “homosexual nightclub,” noting that killing gay people is “the most binding duty and closer to human nature,” it suggests to “avoid targeting places and crowds where minorities are generally found in America,” because “the federal government will be the one taking full responsibility.”

This refers to the heated debates sparked in the U.S. in the aftermath of the Orlando shooting by media, law enforcement and legislators debating the roles that gun laws, hate crimes and terror each played in the incident.

Instead, the guide advises jihadis to target “areas where the Anglo-Saxon community is generally concentrated. This class of the American community is the majority and it is the one that is in the American leadership.”

The document, published specifically with a targeted message against Americans was released in addition to the group’s periodical “Inspire” magazine, which often exploits terror attacks in the West and makes threats against Europe and the United States.

Historically, Al Qaeda has relied on major plots such as the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and other U.S. targets, but now reminds its readers to move forward “in continuation” of the teachings of Al Qaeda mastermind Osama Bin Laden who advocated for ‘lone wolf’ style attacks.

As the Islamic State has gained global notoriety with its jihadis launching local attacks in the West in places such as Brussels, San Bernardino, Garland Texas and most recently in Orlando, Al Qaeda has long been attempting to play catch-up in staying relevant in competing against other jihadist groups for both recruits and funding.

“We standby and support all Muslims who attack America in their homeland regardless of their affiliation to any group or loyalty,” the guide states, justifying the targeting of American civilians with the suggestion that since they elect and pay taxes to a government with “oppressive polices against Muslims everywhere,” they are a population at “war with Islam,” and can no longer be deemed ‘civilians.’

In the guide, the Orlando attack is referred to as one of “the most successful Lone Jihad operations” and will undoubtedly “inspire others to wage similar operations.”

In conclusion the authors note that while Mateen killed and injured almost a third of attendees at the nightclub, an extremely high tally for a ‘lone wolf,’ he could have killed even more by making explosives if he followed the simple guides that appear in previous editions of the group’s “Inspire” magazine.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Al Qaeda to jihadis: ‘Target white Americans, avoid minorities (Original Post) MosheFeingold Jun 2016 OP
Well certainly the NRA apologists here and in Congress, have no interest in restricting guns flowing villager Jun 2016 #1
We could simply ban Muslims from buying guns if absolute security is that important to you. hack89 Jun 2016 #3
Again, you will do all you can to make sure the next mass killer is unhesitatingly well-equipped. nt villager Jun 2016 #4
Because we know the next mass killer is on some secret government watch list? hack89 Jun 2016 #5
Because we know the arms you fetishize, and won't reasonably curb access to, will be in his hands. villager Jun 2016 #6
How do you plan to keep them out of his hands? hack89 Jun 2016 #7
Or to put this another way, what reasonable gun regulations, going forward, do you support? nt villager Jun 2016 #8
Wow, way to hijack a post MosheFeingold Jun 2016 #9
When was that last mass poisoning again? villager Jun 2016 #10
Been a few MosheFeingold Jun 2016 #11
So none in the U.S. by jihadis, in other words. villager Jun 2016 #13
Why the arbitrary limitation to US and Jihadis? MosheFeingold Jun 2016 #14
Um because that's what was in your OP. nt villager Jun 2016 #16
How low the level of debate falls here is sad. n/t MosheFeingold Jun 2016 #19
couldn't agree more. n/t villager Jun 2016 #21
I googled MosheFeingold Jun 2016 #12
I support nearly all proposed gun regulations with only two firm exceptions hack89 Jun 2016 #15
Well, good then. Obviously I disagree with you, my fellow hijacker, on AWBs and registration villager Jun 2016 #17
Sounds good. nt hack89 Jun 2016 #18
america does a good job attacking their own minorites mwrguy Jun 2016 #2
Either way, I'm still more worried about the cops AllTooEasy Jun 2016 #20
So the Four-Paragraph Rule Doesn't Apply Outside LBN? Night Watchman Jun 2016 #22
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. Well certainly the NRA apologists here and in Congress, have no interest in restricting guns flowing
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 03:54 PM
Jun 2016

...to them, for such attacks.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
3. We could simply ban Muslims from buying guns if absolute security is that important to you.
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 04:41 PM
Jun 2016

I happen to think otherwise.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
4. Again, you will do all you can to make sure the next mass killer is unhesitatingly well-equipped. nt
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jun 2016

hack89

(39,171 posts)
5. Because we know the next mass killer is on some secret government watch list?
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jun 2016

how do you know that if it is secret?

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
6. Because we know the arms you fetishize, and won't reasonably curb access to, will be in his hands.
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jun 2016

nt

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
8. Or to put this another way, what reasonable gun regulations, going forward, do you support? nt
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jun 2016

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
9. Wow, way to hijack a post
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:23 PM
Jun 2016

Most impressive distraction.

If you guys keep this up, they'll go back to using pressure cookers or airplanes to prove the purity of their jihad.

Or maybe industrial sabotage, arson, a car/bus/truck, drone, mass poisoning, food adulteration, or any of the millions of other ways you can kill people if you put your mind to it.

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
11. Been a few
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:35 PM
Jun 2016

July 11, 2015 -- Kosovo cuts Pristina water supply over Isis plot to poison reservoir

23 Jan 2015 -- ISIS used chlorine gas on kurds

Apr 2012 - Jun 2013 -- Taliban used rat poison to kill thousands of school children injured, 53 dead

26 Oct 2002 -- Cheniyans poisoned Russians -- 124 killed, 501 injured

And there were a bunch in the 1980s:

751 poisoned in Oregon in 1984 is one I remember -- used Salmonela in salad bars

Chicago Tylenol guy

The Japanese subway that was poisoned

Etc. These are just the ones I remember

Plenty, in other words.





 

villager

(26,001 posts)
13. So none in the U.S. by jihadis, in other words.
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:40 PM
Jun 2016

Since other means -- as we have seen -- are so much easier.

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
14. Why the arbitrary limitation to US and Jihadis?
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:51 PM
Jun 2016

I personally don't make a distinction between how terrorists kill people or what innocents they kill or injure.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
15. I support nearly all proposed gun regulations with only two firm exceptions
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:52 PM
Jun 2016

I reject AWBs and registration. Licensing, universal background checks, training and storage requirements, harsher restrictions on domestic violence offenders - there is a lot of common ground between us.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
17. Well, good then. Obviously I disagree with you, my fellow hijacker, on AWBs and registration
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:54 PM
Jun 2016

...but since we know where there's agreement, perhaps we can dispense with the pro forma sniping on both our parts?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Al Qaeda to jihadis: ‘Tar...