Another Clinton-Trump divide: High-output America vs low-output America
Mark Muro and Sifan LiuTuesday, November 29, 2016
Last week, as my colleague Sifan Liu and I were gnawing on some questions asked by Jim Tankersley of The Washington Post, we happened upon a revealing aspect of the election outcome. While looking at number of influences on the presidential vote outcome, we found that in a year of massive divides, one particular economic split stands out.
Our observation: The less-than-500 counties that Hillary Clinton carried nationwide encompassed a massive 64 percent of Americas economic activity as measured by total output in 2015. By contrast, the more-than-2,600 counties that Donald Trump won generated just 36 percent of the countrys outputjust a little more than one-third of the nations economic activity.
<snip>
The upshot: No election in decades has revealed as sharp a political divide between the densest economic centers and the rest of the country between what Tankersley labeled in a tweet high-output and low-output America. All of which suggests multiple problems. Most broadly, the stark political divide underscores the likelihood of the two parties talking entirely past each other on the most important issues of economic policy. Given the election map we revealed, the Trump administration will likely feel pressure to respond most to the desires and frustrations of the nations struggling hinterland, and discount the priorities and needs of the nations high-output economic base.
On one hand, more attention to the economic and health challenges of rural and small-city Rustbelt America could be welcome, especially if it focuses on the right things: realism about current economic trends, adjustment to change, improving rural education and skills training, and enhancing linkages to nearby metropolitan centers. However, Trumps promises to bring back the coal economy and bring back millions of manufacturing jobs (that now dont exist thanks to automation) dont speak wisely to real-world trends in low-output America. They look backwards and speak instead to local frustrations.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/11/29/another-clinton-trump-divide-high-output-america-vs-low-output-america/