Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Nunes is out of the Russia probe, and the Susan Rice spin collapses
Jennifer Rubin writes in WaPo today:
President Trumps wild accusation and the right-wing medias eagerness to support the claims of the Trump White House, working in cahoots with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), that there was nefarious unmasking of Trump associates picked up in surveillance of Russian officials has proved to be a colossal flop. Nunes wound up discrediting himself and implicating White House staffers in a half-baked scheme to deflect attention from the president.
Right-wing outlets (from Fox News to Breitbart to the New York Post) took the bait from Nunes and his associates, dragging Susan Rice into the matter without evidence of a crime. Indeed, no evidence of impropriety exists and no evidence ties Rice to the leaking of Michael T. Flynns name. Given that the White House does not want to release the documents shared with Nunes that allegedly provide the basis for its tale, we can surmise that Nunes really had no evidence of much of anything.
The blatant effort to confuse and distract from the biggest political scandal of our lifetimes Russian efforts to manipulate our election process and potential coordination with the campaign of the beneficiary of Russias active measures does not come as any surprise. However, certain right-wing media outlets willingness to echo Trumps defamatory misdirection tactics remains as distressing as ever. (It was just this sort of echo chamber effect that Russia used during the campaign to help Trump, as Clint Watts recently explained.) Chin-stroking pundits were obliged to say, Well, both these things are important (as if the Rice narrative has a factual basis), and the damage thereby done. A serious investigation with extensive factual support becomes no more credible than Trumps latest tweet.
The episode highlights a worrisome development with regard to our intelligence community. Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes of Lawfareblog.com explain we run the risk of undoing the grand bargain (i.e. intelligence services get robust powers in exchange for equally robust oversight) that allows our intelligence community to operate within a democratic government.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/04/06/susan-rice-is-a-pawn-in-trumps-effort-to-tear-down-the-system/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.dd20db2066b6
Right-wing outlets (from Fox News to Breitbart to the New York Post) took the bait from Nunes and his associates, dragging Susan Rice into the matter without evidence of a crime. Indeed, no evidence of impropriety exists and no evidence ties Rice to the leaking of Michael T. Flynns name. Given that the White House does not want to release the documents shared with Nunes that allegedly provide the basis for its tale, we can surmise that Nunes really had no evidence of much of anything.
The blatant effort to confuse and distract from the biggest political scandal of our lifetimes Russian efforts to manipulate our election process and potential coordination with the campaign of the beneficiary of Russias active measures does not come as any surprise. However, certain right-wing media outlets willingness to echo Trumps defamatory misdirection tactics remains as distressing as ever. (It was just this sort of echo chamber effect that Russia used during the campaign to help Trump, as Clint Watts recently explained.) Chin-stroking pundits were obliged to say, Well, both these things are important (as if the Rice narrative has a factual basis), and the damage thereby done. A serious investigation with extensive factual support becomes no more credible than Trumps latest tweet.
The episode highlights a worrisome development with regard to our intelligence community. Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes of Lawfareblog.com explain we run the risk of undoing the grand bargain (i.e. intelligence services get robust powers in exchange for equally robust oversight) that allows our intelligence community to operate within a democratic government.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/04/06/susan-rice-is-a-pawn-in-trumps-effort-to-tear-down-the-system/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.dd20db2066b6
I'm not a fan of Jennifer Rubin. If you've read her columns, I'm willing to bet that you're not either. But, on this one, she is right on target!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 11564 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nunes is out of the Russia probe, and the Susan Rice spin collapses (Original Post)
Frequent Ranter
Apr 2017
OP
Yeah, the "other side" became NeverTrump-ers, and the lunatic fringe became the "other side"
Jonny Appleseed
Apr 2017
#2
Definite right winger, but it's obvious she loves America more than her political ideology.
tableturner
Apr 2017
#7
cilla4progress
(24,772 posts)1. Well that's the problem isn't it
Media giving credence to "both" sides - reality and the lunatic fringe - in the interest of appearing impartial.
Does" the fairness doctrine" factor in here?
Jonny Appleseed
(960 posts)2. Yeah, the "other side" became NeverTrump-ers, and the lunatic fringe became the "other side"
The lunatic fringe occupies the whitehouse tho.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,048 posts)3. Jennifer Rubin's loathing of Trump is a thing of beauty!
cilla4progress
(24,772 posts)4. I looked her up
is she a Dem or not?
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,048 posts)5. She was a big Romney fan in 2012 so I doubt it!
tableturner
(1,684 posts)7. Definite right winger, but it's obvious she loves America more than her political ideology.
dalton99a
(81,590 posts)8. Trump hates her
Her columns have been consistently brutal
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)6. What will be the next conspiracy theory?
There have been different conspiracy theories each week