Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Deadlock: Mattis Vs. White House On Pentagon Nominees
http://breakingdefense.com/2017/05/deadlock-mattis-vs-white-house-on-pentagon-nominees/Deadlock: Mattis Vs. White House On Pentagon Nominees
By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
on May 08, 2017 at 3:52 PM
WASHINGTON: Chronic conflict between Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and the Trump White House has hobbled the nomination process for top Pentagon posts, a source familiar with the Trump personnel team tells Breaking Defense. In several cases, the source said, the Trump team recommended nominees with extensive experience and bipartisan respect Rep. Randy Forbes, Sen. Jim Talent only to have Mattis shoot them down. In others, Mattis picked outsider candidates Philip Bilden, Mark Green who later withdrew.
After more than 100 days in office, Mattis remains the only Trump appointee in place at the Pentagon, left without the usual support team of deputy, under, and assistant secretaries. Its a lack that House Armed Services chairman Mac Thornberry has repeatedly and publicly lamented.
(snip)
So why has Trump repeatedly nominated men with huge fortunes but no Washington experience? Its definitely more complicated than Donald Trump loves outsider billionaires,' the source said. Way more complicated than that, because at least two of these names came from Mattis, not the Trump camp at all. White Houses candidates that Mattis shot down, by contrast, included not only Forbes but former Senator Jim Talent, the source said: Its hard to argue that these are not high-caliber people.
My sense is that Mattis just doesnt want people who he perceives as being political which is ridiculous because were talking about political appointees, the source seethed. My theory (is Mattis thinks that) if you supported Donald Trump, you probably are not a high-caliber person. Its caused stalemate, the source summed up. The president has some very specific defense priorities that he laid out in the campaign, and theres no one minding the store to see that those priorities are implemented. What about Mattis? He doesnt see his job as being the implementer of Donald Trumps defense priorities, the source said. I think he sees himself as being a warfighter.
Mattis does have two wars to run, three nuclear powers to deter, and none of the usual raft of Senate-confirmed aides to ensure the career civil service and military are actually doing what the administration wants. Whats more, at this point, even the best vetted, best qualified, most inoffensively apolitical appointees would struggle to get through the Senate before the 4th of July and August recesses start cutting into working days.
(snip)
(((IMO, this piece is a back-door slam from the Dump team against Mattis.)))
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 2860 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deadlock: Mattis Vs. White House On Pentagon Nominees (Original Post)
nitpicker
May 2017
OP
roscoeroscoe
(1,369 posts)1. I think you are right
If anyone in this 'administration' has some kind of sense, it would seem like Mattis