If you think they stole it, read this: Elections officials outgunned in Russia's cyberwar against US
Elections officials outgunned in Russias cyberwar against America
By Greg Gordon, Ben Wieder and Kevin G. Hall
snip
What Brian and other election officials across eight states didnt know until the leak of a classified intelligence is that Russian operatives hacked into the Florida headquarters of VR Systems, Inc., the vendor that sold them digital products to manage voter registrations.
A week before the election, the hackers sent emails using a VR Systems address to 122 state and local election officials across the country, inviting them to open an attachment wired with malicious software that spoofed legitimate elections-related services, the report said. The malware was designed to retrieve enough additional information to set the stage for serious mischief, said the National Security Agency report disclosed by the Intercept, an investigative web site.
That wasnt the only type of attack.
snip
In Georgia, where a nationally watched congressional runoff race is scheduled for Tuesday, Politico magazine reported that a U.S. hacker from a national laboratory seeking to expose vulnerabilities in election systems was able to easily download millions of voter records from Kennesaw State Universitys Center for Election Systems, which manages them. Election watchdog groups say subsequent warnings to the state about a hole in their system went unheeded for months.
David Jefferson, a computer scientist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California who has acted in his personal capacity in trying to safeguard election integrity, said he believes it is absolutely possible that the Russians affected last years election.
And we have done almost nothing to seriously examine that, he said.
The web connecting the Trump administration to Russia
snip
The Russians really were engaged in a pattern of attacks against the machinery of the election, and not merely a pattern of propaganda or information warfare and selective leaking, said Alex Halderman, a University of Michigan computer science professor. The question is, how far did they get in that pattern of attacks, and were they successful?
Election officials across the country may not even know if theyve been attacked, computer scientists say, pointing to the scenario that played out in Durham County.
State and local voting systems appear to be easy prey for sophisticated hackers.
snip
If we dont fix our badly broken system before the next major presidential election, were going to be hacked into, said Barbara Simons, author of Broken Ballots, a 2012 book about election security published by Stanford University. It might not just be Russia. It might be North Korea, China, Iran or partisans.
While the Netherlands opted to shift to paper ballots when alerted the Russians were trying to swing its election outcome to the right, U.S. election officials have stood pat.
snip
The ability to manipulate the vote tally, thats quite complicated, the Homeland Security official said. We didnt see an ability to really accomplish that even in an individual voting machine. You have to have physical access to do that. Its not as easy as you think.
Some of the nations top experts in voting security disagree.
Lawrence Livermores Jefferson voiced frustration with the defensive refrain of denials from state and local election officials, including the National Association of Secretaries of State.
Election officials do not talk about vulnerabilities, Jefferson said, because that would give the advantage to the attacker. And they dont want to undermine public confidence in elections.
North Carolina was considered to be a swing state in the presidential race, and Durham County, with an African-American population of more than 37 percent, had voted more than 75 percent in favor of putting and keeping Barack Obama in the White House. Last years governors race was a dead heat entering Election Day.
The chaos in Durham County led to 90-minute delays. Some voters rang a Voter Protection Hotline to complain that their names had disappeared from the registration system or that they were told they already had voted.
The county hired a contractor to investigate the foul-up, but the inquiry never examined whether the system was hacked.
Twenty other North Carolina counties used the system, including Mecklenburg County, encompassing most of Charlotte. Though none reported problems on the scale of Durham County, release of the NSA report prompted the North Carolina Board of Elections to order a new investigation.
A former FBI agent is leading the inquiry. Critics say the three-member investigative team again lacks expertise in forensics.
snip
Halderman, the University of Michigan expert, said he believes the best solution is for states to require paper trails for all voting equipment and post-election audits to ensure the vote counts are authentic.
Theres no guarantee that well know were under attack, he said, unless we do the quality control that we need by doing these audits to detect manipulation.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article157039299.html#storylink=cpy
And just so you know there is hope, Verified Voting is doing great work on this:
https://www.verifiedvoting.org/about-vvo/
Most of the experts mentioned in the article are involved with them.
You can sign up for their email list on their site.
Edited to add: Example of one thing Verified Voting did recently:
Verified Voting Blog: Technology Experts Letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp
Regarding the FBI criminal investigation into an alleged cyber attack of the Kennesaw State University Center for Election Systems
https://www.verifiedvoting.org/verified-voting-letter-to-georgia-secretary-of-state-brian-kemp/
stephensolomita
(91 posts)Gee, it sure is nice to read some good news for a change.
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)They are doing great work on this issue.
dalton99a
(81,476 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Democratic Congress and Senate Members,this is what scare the crap out of them. We are on the verge of our Election system loosing it's confidence factor. So Friggin close. If GA 6 turns into a nightmare of numbers being switched,then just hang on,the manure will hit the fan in a major way.
ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)Is there any national Democrat calling for paper, hand-counted ballots?
If they ever do, then I will believe they are finally waking up.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)I love the quote...If we dont fix our badly broken system before the next major presidential election, were going to be hacked into,
Yeah, right. Some of us have been saying this since 2004, but have been generally ignored and called conspiracy nuts.
Neither side cares to do a thing about it, and NOTHING WILL CHANGE.
As they pointed out in the article, there be problems in GA. I do not expect the Democrat to win, for that reason alone. The repubs play to win, and it does not matter to them if they have to cheat to do so, all that matters is Winning.
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)Rainbow Droid
(722 posts)And here we are.
Liberal In Red State
(442 posts)Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Advertising or phone calls
One reason they only have the phony investigations (Muellers aside) is they are all caught up in it. They are all about CYA. If Mueller finds something, they will probably disagree.
KT2000
(20,577 posts)about the potential for hacks and offered assistance to states to protect their voting integrity but they were turned down by the states - why?
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)poorly on them and don't want to shake public confidence in elections. And many of them just plain don't know enough about technology to recognize it could be a problem.
Because republican red state leaders were working closely with Russia swing the election via hacking.
diva77
(7,640 posts)from your post:
Lawrence Livermores Jefferson voiced frustration with the defensive refrain of denials from state and local election officials, including the National Association of Secretaries of State.
Election officials do not talk about vulnerabilities, Jefferson said, because that would give the advantage to the attacker. And they dont want to undermine public confidence in elections.
---------------------
Tired old talking point about not wanting to undermine public confidence in elections. It's completely backwards. They never had a credible reason FOR public confidence in "elections" conducted with computerized voting equipment. The machines do not meet the burden of proof that votes are cast as intended and tabulated accurately.
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)iluvtennis
(19,852 posts)...in addition to the front end propaganda machine. We really need to go back to manual vote registration and vote counting until the computer and software systems have the correct security solutions in place.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)Is not a narcissistic bragging loud mouth idiot. Openly asking a foreign enemy to hack your opponent and clearly showing them blatant favortism is not a good idea.
certainot
(9,090 posts)padfun
(1,786 posts)even though they are a minority.