Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,881 posts)
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 12:53 AM Sep 2017

Updated federal driverless policy continues, and expands, hands-off approach

Source: Washington Post

Updated federal driverless policy continues, and expands, hands-off approach

By Michael Laris September 12 at 2:46 PM

Each day, driverless cars carry passengers around U.S. cities big and small. But federal officials — driven by bipartisan concerns about stifling a promising industry or seeming too old-fashioned — have not imposed any new safety requirements.

On Tuesday, the Trump administration weighed in with its first set of suggestions for how autonomous vehicles should be managed. It continues — and, in several significant ways, extends — the generally hands-off approach taken under the Obama administration, which released the first set of voluntary guidelines last year.

Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao announced the “2.0” version of the federal policy in Ann Arbor, Mich. The guidelines continue to rely on technology companies and automakers to voluntarily submit information explaining why their cars are safe and how their passengers will be protected.

Under President Barack Obama, the policy was built around a 15-point safety checklist, covering areas such as crashworthiness, how cars are meant to respond to hazards and where they are designed to drive. Under President Trump, several key areas were dropped from the list, including privacy and ethical considerations.

Those were removed because they were “speculative in nature and outside” the authorities of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, according an explanation of the change that accompanied the revised guidance. “These are important areas for further discussion and research, but it would be premature to include those considerations in this document,” according to NHTSA.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/updated-federal-driverless-policy-continues-and-expands-hands-off-approach/2017/09/12/7db413fc-97c9-11e7-82e4-f1076f6d6152_story.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Updated federal driverless policy continues, and expands, hands-off approach (Original Post) Eugene Sep 2017 OP
Only a mad person would support driverless vehicles without infrastructure improvements. longship Sep 2017 #1

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. Only a mad person would support driverless vehicles without infrastructure improvements.
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 02:18 AM
Sep 2017

However, the Ray Kurzweil singularity kooks and their followers see technology advancing way beyond practical considerations. I similarly group them with the driverless vehicle advocates.

Try your damned driverless vehicles on Interstate 5 in SoCal through the Tejon Pass, often called "The Grapevine" by locals. It is one scary assed drive. Driverless vehicles on that road would result in mayhem, death, and destruction. Driverless tractor trailers would result in mass death.



Keep your damned driverless vehicles off the roads I drive on.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Updated federal driverles...