Trumps new travel ban still has no justification - The Washington Post Editorial Board
By Editorial Board September 25 at 7:49 PM
FOUR HOURS before President Trumps ban on travel from six majority-Muslim countries expired on Sunday, the White House issued a new proclamation this time also barring entry into the United States by certain citizens of North Korea, Venezuela and Chad. Now in its third iteration, the travel ban has been steadily watered down from Mr. Trumps promised Muslim ban. But the fact that some Christians are now also forbidden from entering the country does little to recommend the policy.
The second version of Mr. Trumps travel ban, revised after the courts blocked the first from going into effect, called for a temporary halt on travel while the Department of Homeland Security prepared a report on the adequacy of vetting procedures across the globe. This third order limits entry from countries that the department determined did not provide sufficient information to confirm that their citizens were not security threats.
Of the majority-Muslim nations included in the second order, travel from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen and Somalia remains limited, while restrictions have been removed from Sudan. Travelers from Iraq are not barred from the United States but will face additional scrutiny. The ban is a patchwork of different standards for different countries: Travel from Syria and North Korea is entirely banned, while only certain Venezuelan government officials will be denied entry.
Mr. Trumps latest order may be the result of a more considered process than were the first two versions. But the end product is still lacking in sense. Travel to the United States from North Korea is practically nonexistent so why ban it? Likewise, the order indicates that Venezuelan officials will be barred as a punitive measure given their failure to cooperate but what does this have to do with national security, the bans ostensible purpose? And why include Chad, a U.S. ally crucial to military efforts against the Boko Haram terrorist organization? It may be the case that Chads government failed to provide the requested vetting documentation. But if Mr. Trumps main concern is counterterrorism, the blow to the U.S.-Chad partnership means that this designation will do more harm than good.
Theres no evidence that limiting travel from any of these countries will have a significant effect on Americans safety. Even the Department of Homeland Security concluded shortly after the first travel ban that a persons citizenship has little to do with the likelihood of their posing a threat. Research shows that the majority of recent terrorist attacks on U.S. soil have been carried out by Americans
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-new-travel-ban-still-has-no-justification/2017/09/25/2237274e-a232-11e7-8cfe-d5b912fabc99_story.html