Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 06:46 PM Apr 2018

Supreme Court chief schmoozed with Trump just before travel ban hearing

https://shareblue.com/supreme-court-chief-justice-john-roberts-state-dinner-travel-ban/


Supreme Court chief schmoozed with Trump just before travel ban hearing


While it’s not unusual for Supreme Court justices to attend state dinners, it is unusual for state dinners to be held on the eve of such monumental court cases, making Roberts’ decision to attend a questionable one.

As a guest at the dinner, Roberts was rubbing elbows with the architects of the policy that will be argued in court Wednesday — giving the appearance of potential impropriety, particularly if the court comes down with a ruling in favor of the Trump administration.

An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society.

A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of conduct and should personally observe those standards, so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved,” the Code of Conduct states.

“Adherence to this responsibility helps to maintain public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and injures our system of government under law.”


Unlike the lower courts, the conservative-leaning Supreme Court has sided with Trump previously and allowed most of his ban to take effect.
While it remains to be seen what will ultimately come of Wednesday’s oral arguments, Roberts’ decision to attend a black-tie affair with the architects of the policy on the eve of its day in court will undoubtedly raise questions about his impartiality — or lack thereof.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court chief schmoozed with Trump just before travel ban hearing (Original Post) Wwcd Apr 2018 OP
Nothing is normal, nothing is as it should be, it is all chaos Angry Dragon Apr 2018 #1
Roberts is not fair and impartial, never has been and never will be. BigmanPigman Apr 2018 #2
We got him in the first place because SCOTUS handed Bush the 2000 election. So yeah. Never has been Amaryllis Apr 2018 #3
It doesn't look good no.. Volaris Apr 2018 #4

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
3. We got him in the first place because SCOTUS handed Bush the 2000 election. So yeah. Never has been
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 08:51 PM
Apr 2018

along with the rest of them that handed Bush the election. Gore would not have chosen Roberts.

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
4. It doesn't look good no..
Thu Apr 26, 2018, 04:37 AM
Apr 2018

IF on the other hand, the decision comes back against the administration, I'd bet even money after odd that Roberts way of telling Trump and his crew of criminals 'fuck you. We're the supreme goddamn court and we aren't bought off as easily as a good meal and a social event.'

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Supreme Court chief schmo...