Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Boehner Backs Out Of Debt-Limit Deal
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/03/boehner-backs-out-of-debt-limit-deal.php?ref=fpb[div style="width: 210px;float: left"][div style="float: left; width: 200px"]
Deal schmeel. We cant spend money..we gave away to the rich...ha, ha, ha!
House Speaker John Boehner lent his full support Thursday to undoing a key part of the debt-limit deal he struck with President Obama and the rest of the congressional leadership last summer.
Republicans in the House, Boehner confirmed, will advance legislation to replace automatic cuts to the defense budget from taking effect on Jan. 1. Those cuts are part of an enforcement mechanism he and a majority of his members agreed to accept, but that would only be triggered if Congress was unable to pass a significant deficit-reduction bill. They included the defense cuts, intended to force GOP cooperation and domestic-spending cuts, intended to force Democratic cooperation.
The GOPs unwillingness to accept higher tax revenue doomed that effort, and so the automatic cuts known technically as sequestration are locked in. Now Boehner and the GOP are accelerating efforts to undo the one part of the deal that they dont like.
We should never have had the sequester, Boehner told reporters at his weekly press availability Thursday. I always thought that the Super Committee had a real chance to do good work, to produce savings so that the sequester wouldnt kick in. I think that the sequester will hurt our Department of Defense, will hurt our ability to do what Americans believe is our most basic responsibility, and thats to provide security for the American people. I believe that Secretary Panetta believes the same thing. And for that matter, I think the White House believes that the sequester is totally unacceptable. Thats why the House will act this spring to replace that [defense] sequester. And hopefully in some time near in the future the Congress will really act to deal with our long term spending problem and our deficit problem. We cant keep spending money we dont have.
<more>
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boehner Backs Out Of Debt-Limit Deal (Original Post)
Bill USA
Mar 2012
OP
3waygeek
(2,034 posts)1. Boehner pulls out?
I thought the Rethugs were opposed to contraception.
cstanleytech
(28,473 posts)7. If only his father had ....sigh
marmar
(79,741 posts)2. Has there ever been a more useless, ineffective Speaker than Boehnhead?
nt
denverbill
(11,489 posts)3. FU Boner. You useless slaves to Norquist and ALEC refused to raise taxes or compromise at all.
Damn I hate these weaselly little shits.
Zorro
(18,693 posts)6. Obama has the upper hand here
and hopefully he and the Democrats will pound the shit out of Republicants for not negotiating in good faith, and for refusing to compromise on raising taxes on the 1% to get through the impending budget crunch.
If the Democrats play their cards well, voters will be so thoroughly sick of every Republicant that those regressive, subversive assholes will be thrown out of office en masse. But we'll see; Democrats have a quite successful track record at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
cstanleytech
(28,473 posts)8. Aye, the dems need to hammer the republicans long and hard on this.
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)9. Republicans aren't interested in a budget that reduces spending....
they interested in a budget that spreads the wealth around to their military and industrial complex buddies, while taking it from social programs.