Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
Sun Nov 24, 2019, 01:55 AM Nov 2019

Fired from The New York Times over Trump

I was told there was concern, even at the publisher’s level, about one small edit I proposed to a story

<snip>

"When I saw that infamous “Trump Urges Unity vs. Racism” headline in The New York Times, I was not surprised in the least. And when I learned that it had set off subscription cancellations among outraged readers, I thought: “Finally! What took so long?”

Having spent eight years taking deep daily dives into New York Times stories as a copy editor, I can with confidence impart this bit of news fit to print: The Gray Lady has, ever since Trump’s election, been playing an insidious double game to ensure its survival.

Before Donald Trump began calling it the “failing” New York Times, the paper looked as if it was indeed foundering. In the aftermath of Trump’s shock electoral victory, however, The Times rapidly turned its fortunes around, even becoming the legacy media’s most notable success story in the online age.

How did this happen? Digital subscriptions were key, and many of them came from liberals, most probably despairing Hillary Clinton voters who saw themselves as essentially crowdsourcing the revenue to get the “failing” Times out of trouble and thereby 1) defy their candidate’s vanquisher and 2) assure themselves of a prominent light in the darkness about to descend on the nation under Trump.

But the paper’s anti-Trump rescuers missed a trick.

While The Times did try to reinforce its typical new subscriber’s liberal illusions about the paper (by, say, giving a new prominence to its most liberal opinion columnists, regularly placing them at the top of the home page,) in its actual news coverage or corporate actions it is not especially liberal, compassionate or even just fair. Nor has The Times been particularly harsh on Trump, who is, after all, a colorful hometown character for the paper’s owners and managers, one of the New York media’s most enduring sparring partners and playmates, and now the first U.S. president from New York since Franklin Delano Roosevelt."

https://www.salon.com/2019/11/23/fired-from-the-new-york-times-over-trump/
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fired from The New York Times over Trump (Original Post) Scurrilous Nov 2019 OP
Good read. Thanks. nt littlemissmartypants Nov 2019 #1
Seldom agree with salon, but they certainly got that one right. I'm done with the nyt Thekaspervote Nov 2019 #2
KR! Cha Nov 2019 #3
K&R Thanks for posting. alwaysinasnit Nov 2019 #4
Yep. This is pretty blatant. I live in NY, but my paper is the Washington Post. Squinch Nov 2019 #5
I now it had zero effect... PJMcK Nov 2019 #6
Goes to show Dean Baquet has no business being editor of any kind. K&R crickets Nov 2019 #7

Thekaspervote

(32,750 posts)
2. Seldom agree with salon, but they certainly got that one right. I'm done with the nyt
Sun Nov 24, 2019, 04:07 AM
Nov 2019

Shitty two siderism... May work for some, not me

Cha

(297,029 posts)
3. KR!
Sun Nov 24, 2019, 04:33 AM
Nov 2019

"..colorful hometown character.. " trump is a ******* fascist treasonous sociopathic Liar. Nothing "colorful" about him.

Thank you, Scurrilous!

PJMcK

(22,023 posts)
6. I now it had zero effect...
Sun Nov 24, 2019, 09:03 AM
Nov 2019

...but I canceled my digital subscription to the NY Times. Fuck Dean Bacquet and fuck the NY Times' "balanced" reporting.

I get better news coverage and opinions from Democratic Underground.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Fired from The New York T...