Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Trump Declares War
Qasem Soleimani a major-general in Irans Revolutionary Guard and the leader of its Quds Force, a unit responsible for external and clandestine operations was once described by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Islamic Republics supreme leader, as a living martyr of the revolution. The living martyr is now a dead martyr, killed in an American airstrike along with five other people reportedly including Naim Qassem, the deputy secretary-general of Lebanese Hizbullah at Baghdad airport. Khamenei, who promoted Soleimani posthumously to lieutenant-general, has tweeted that harsh vengeance is forthcoming; Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary-general of Lebanese Hizbullah, has declared that it is the responsibility and task of all resistance fighters worldwide to avenge their deaths.
...
What, then, was the tipping point? The storming of the American embassy in Baghdad, only a few months after the Aramco attack, was clearly important: other than personal criticism or the prospect of impeachment, from which the confrontation provides a useful distraction nothing enrages Trump so much as spectacles of American weakness. A sense of pique may also have contributed to the assassination order. Soleimani seemed to take pleasure in taunting the Americans. There is not one night we sleep without thinking of you, he said in July 2018 on Iranian television. Mr Gambler Trump, we are near you where you dont expect. Trump may have wished to prove to Soleimani that he was near him when he didnt expect. And Khameneis remark, after the storming of the embassy in Baghdad, that you cant do anything, may have been the last straw.
Its hard to explain Trumps decision other than as a response to insult, since such a dangerous escalation seems inconsistent with his aversion to foreign wars, and his (so far) unerring sensitivity to his right-wing isolationist base. As Robert Malley of the International Crisis Group remarked on Twitter, killing Soleimani is for all intents and purposes a declaration of war against Iran. It is, of course, possible that Trump is unaware of this, or that he imagines that Iran cant do anything in response and will simply absorb the blow in which case he is hallucinating.
By killing Soleimani, Trump has not only supplied the Islamic Republic with a powerful casus belli, he has also reinforced its longstanding narrative of martyrdom at the hands of the Great Satan, and may well help to strengthen the supreme leaders hand at the very moment that the regime is facing popular anti-Iranian protests in Iraq and Lebanon, and reeling from a series of revolts at home in which hundreds of Iranians were killed by security forces. Not for the first time, the American government has proved an objective ally of Irans hardliners. The man once known as the living martyr would be smiling.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2020/january/trump-declares-war
...
What, then, was the tipping point? The storming of the American embassy in Baghdad, only a few months after the Aramco attack, was clearly important: other than personal criticism or the prospect of impeachment, from which the confrontation provides a useful distraction nothing enrages Trump so much as spectacles of American weakness. A sense of pique may also have contributed to the assassination order. Soleimani seemed to take pleasure in taunting the Americans. There is not one night we sleep without thinking of you, he said in July 2018 on Iranian television. Mr Gambler Trump, we are near you where you dont expect. Trump may have wished to prove to Soleimani that he was near him when he didnt expect. And Khameneis remark, after the storming of the embassy in Baghdad, that you cant do anything, may have been the last straw.
Its hard to explain Trumps decision other than as a response to insult, since such a dangerous escalation seems inconsistent with his aversion to foreign wars, and his (so far) unerring sensitivity to his right-wing isolationist base. As Robert Malley of the International Crisis Group remarked on Twitter, killing Soleimani is for all intents and purposes a declaration of war against Iran. It is, of course, possible that Trump is unaware of this, or that he imagines that Iran cant do anything in response and will simply absorb the blow in which case he is hallucinating.
By killing Soleimani, Trump has not only supplied the Islamic Republic with a powerful casus belli, he has also reinforced its longstanding narrative of martyrdom at the hands of the Great Satan, and may well help to strengthen the supreme leaders hand at the very moment that the regime is facing popular anti-Iranian protests in Iraq and Lebanon, and reeling from a series of revolts at home in which hundreds of Iranians were killed by security forces. Not for the first time, the American government has proved an objective ally of Irans hardliners. The man once known as the living martyr would be smiling.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2020/january/trump-declares-war
Link to tweet
More from Robert Malley:
A Perilous Turning Point in the U.S.-Iran Confrontation
The killing by the U.S. of Qassem Soleimani, the head of Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Quds Force, marks a dramatic turning point. Soleimani had been in Washingtons crosshairs for many years, and successive U.S. presidents could likely have ordered his assassination in the past. That they chose not to do so suggests that they worried the costs would outweigh the benefits. With his decision, President Donald Trump is making clear that he abides by a different calculus: that, given the vast power imbalance, Iran has far more to fear from war than does the U.S. The strike that killed the Iranian general along with others notably Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a senior commander of the pro-Iranian Iraqi Shiite militia was, in accordance with this view, meant as a deterrent to further Iranian attacks.
It is almost certain to be anything but. Iran may fear U.S. retaliation, but it fears projecting that fear even more. From its perspective, it cannot allow what it views as a declaration of war to remain unanswered. It will respond and now must decide whether its reaction will be direct or through the array of proxies and allied forces Soleimani helped build; immediate or deferred; in Iraq or elsewhere in the Gulf, Syria or beyond. The U.S. presence in Iraq, already shaky after the 29 December strike that killed two dozen members of a pro-Iranian Iraqi militia, is now hanging by a thread; the Trump administration may decide to depart preemptively rather than be forced to leave on Baghdads orders. The truce in Yemen between Saudi Arabia and Iran-backed Huthi fighters also is in greater jeopardy. Watch in particular for Irans announcement of its next steps on the nuclear front, taken in response to Washingtons violation of the 2015 deal. A serious step on 6 January had been predicted; in all likelihood, it just got far more serious.
The U.S.-Iranian game has changed. Their rivalry for the most part played out as an attritional standoff: Washington laying siege to Irans economy in hopes that financial duress would lead either to its governments capitulation to U.S. demands or to its ouster; and Tehran responding with actions that maintained a veneer of plausible deniability. Targeting Soleimani is liable to mark a shift from attrition toward open confrontation.
In short, a U.S. president who repeatedly claimed that he does not wish to drag the country into another Middle East war has just brought that war one step closer. And a U.S. administration that argues it killed the Iranian general in order to avert further attacks just made those attacks more likely. Iran will retaliate; the U.S. will avenge the retaliation; and many across the region will pay the price.
https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/gulf-and-arabian-peninsula/iran/perilous-turning-point-us-iran-confrontation
The killing by the U.S. of Qassem Soleimani, the head of Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Quds Force, marks a dramatic turning point. Soleimani had been in Washingtons crosshairs for many years, and successive U.S. presidents could likely have ordered his assassination in the past. That they chose not to do so suggests that they worried the costs would outweigh the benefits. With his decision, President Donald Trump is making clear that he abides by a different calculus: that, given the vast power imbalance, Iran has far more to fear from war than does the U.S. The strike that killed the Iranian general along with others notably Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a senior commander of the pro-Iranian Iraqi Shiite militia was, in accordance with this view, meant as a deterrent to further Iranian attacks.
It is almost certain to be anything but. Iran may fear U.S. retaliation, but it fears projecting that fear even more. From its perspective, it cannot allow what it views as a declaration of war to remain unanswered. It will respond and now must decide whether its reaction will be direct or through the array of proxies and allied forces Soleimani helped build; immediate or deferred; in Iraq or elsewhere in the Gulf, Syria or beyond. The U.S. presence in Iraq, already shaky after the 29 December strike that killed two dozen members of a pro-Iranian Iraqi militia, is now hanging by a thread; the Trump administration may decide to depart preemptively rather than be forced to leave on Baghdads orders. The truce in Yemen between Saudi Arabia and Iran-backed Huthi fighters also is in greater jeopardy. Watch in particular for Irans announcement of its next steps on the nuclear front, taken in response to Washingtons violation of the 2015 deal. A serious step on 6 January had been predicted; in all likelihood, it just got far more serious.
The U.S.-Iranian game has changed. Their rivalry for the most part played out as an attritional standoff: Washington laying siege to Irans economy in hopes that financial duress would lead either to its governments capitulation to U.S. demands or to its ouster; and Tehran responding with actions that maintained a veneer of plausible deniability. Targeting Soleimani is liable to mark a shift from attrition toward open confrontation.
In short, a U.S. president who repeatedly claimed that he does not wish to drag the country into another Middle East war has just brought that war one step closer. And a U.S. administration that argues it killed the Iranian general in order to avert further attacks just made those attacks more likely. Iran will retaliate; the U.S. will avenge the retaliation; and many across the region will pay the price.
https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/gulf-and-arabian-peninsula/iran/perilous-turning-point-us-iran-confrontation
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1507 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Declares War (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2020
OP
Stuart G
(38,453 posts)1. K and R