Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,846 posts)
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 12:23 PM Jan 2020

U.S. Supreme Court takes up presidential Electoral College dispute

Source: Reuters

SUPREME COURT JANUARY 17, 2020 / 3:53 PM / UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO

U.S. Supreme Court takes up presidential Electoral College dispute

Andrew Chung
5 MIN READ

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - As the 2020 race heats up, the Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear a dispute involving the complex U.S. presidential election system focusing on whether Electoral College electors are free to break their pledges to back the candidate who wins their state’s popular vote, an act that could upend an election.

The Supreme Court will take up appeals in two cases - from Washington state and Colorado - involving electors who decided to vote in the Electoral College process for someone other than Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016 even though she won the popular vote in their states.

The justices will determine if such so-called faithless electors have the discretion to cast Electoral College votes as they see fit or whether states can impose restrictions including with penalties. The case is expected to be argued in April and decided by the end of June.

President Donald Trump is seeking re-election on Nov. 3, with a field of Democrats seeking their party’s nomination to challenge him. His administration did not take a side in either case.

“We are glad the Supreme Court has recognized the paramount importance of clearly determining the rules of the road for presidential electors for the upcoming election and all future elections,” said Lawrence Lessig, a lawyer for the faithless electors sanctioned in Washington and Colorado.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-electoral/u-s-supreme-court-takes-up-presidential-electoral-college-dispute-idUSKBN1ZG2EH

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court takes up presidential Electoral College dispute (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2020 OP
In 2012, Donald Trump tweeted that the electoral college system was a 'disaster for a democracy.' keithbvadu2 Jan 2020 #1
Faithless electors invalidate votes dlk Jan 2020 #2
Shit wryter2000 Jan 2020 #3
If I understand the concept behind the Electoral College, it was designed to prevent Nitram Jan 2020 #4

keithbvadu2

(36,731 posts)
1. In 2012, Donald Trump tweeted that the electoral college system was a 'disaster for a democracy.'
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 12:31 PM
Jan 2020

In 2012, Donald Trump tweeted that the electoral college system was a 'disaster for a democracy.'

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-described-the-electoral-college-as-a-disaster/

After losing the popular vote, President-elect Donald Trump has decided that the Electoral College is a pretty smart way to elect a president after all.

http://fortune.com/2016/11/17/donald-trump-electoral-college-hillary-clinton-popular-vote/

dlk

(11,540 posts)
2. Faithless electors invalidate votes
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 12:40 PM
Jan 2020

Either we have a democracy with one person, one vote or we have something entirely different.

wryter2000

(46,031 posts)
3. Shit
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 12:52 PM
Jan 2020

That could do away with the drive to make all electors vote for the winner of the popular vote. It’s the easiest way to get rid of the electoral college.

Nitram

(22,776 posts)
4. If I understand the concept behind the Electoral College, it was designed to prevent
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 06:35 PM
Jan 2020

a demagogue from winning an election because the Electoral college would protect the US from such a result. that means they were to vote their conscience, not just blindly vote for whoever the voters voted for. And now we know how well the turned out.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»U.S. Supreme Court takes ...