House managers: Trump won't be vindicated. The Senate won't be, either.
By Adam Schiff, Jerrold Nadler, Zoe Lofgren, Hakeem Jeffries, Val Demings, Sylvia Garcia and Jason Crow
'Over the past two weeks, we have argued the impeachment case against President Trump, presenting overwhelming evidence that he solicited foreign interference to cheat in the next election and jeopardized our national security by withholding hundreds of millions of dollars in security assistance to pressure Ukraine to do his political bidding. When the president got caught and his scheme was exposed, he tried to cover it up and obstruct Congresss investigation in an unprecedented fashion. As the trial progressed, a growing number of Republican senators acknowledged that the House had proved the presidents serious misconduct.
Throughout the trial, new and incriminating evidence against the president came to light almost daily, and there can be no doubt that it will continue to emerge in books, in newspapers or in congressional hearings. Most important, reports of former national security adviser John Boltons forthcoming book only further confirm that the president illegally withheld military aid to Ukraine until Kyiv announced the sham investigations that the president sought for his political benefit.
Although Bolton told the House that he would sue rather than appear to testify pursuant to a subpoena, he appeared to have a change of heart and made it clear that he would be willing to testify in the Senate. Yet, rather than hear what Bolton had to say, Republican senators voted to hold the first impeachment trial in U.S. history without a single live witness or new document.
Trump impeachment vote live updates
Notwithstanding the Constitutions mandate that the Senate shall have the sole power to try impeachments, a narrow majority of senators opted not to, and instead acted as though it were an appellate court precluded from going beyond the record in the House. Nothing supported this unprecedented prohibition on witnesses and documents, except the overriding interest of a president determined to hide any further incriminating information from the American people and a Senate majority leader in his thrall.
Instead, the presidents defenders resorted to a radical theory that would validate his worst, most authoritarian instincts. They argued that a president cannot abuse his power, no matter how corrupt his conduct, if he believes it will benefit his reelection. The Founders would have been aghast at such a sweeping assertion of absolute power, completely at odds with our system of checks and balances. Even some of the presidents lawyers were ultimately forced to back away from it.
And so, at last, the presidents team urged that it should be left to the voters to pronounce judgment on the presidents misconduct, even as it worked to prevent the public from learning the full facts that might inform their decision. More ominously, this leaves the president free to try to cheat in the very election that is supposed to provide the remedy for his cheating.
Just this week, with the vote on impeachment still pending before the Senate, the presidents personal lawyer and emissary, Rudolph W. Giuliani, repeated his call for Ukraine to investigate the presidents political rival and urged the president to carry on seeking such illicit help.
When we made our final arguments to the Senate, we asked whether there was one Republican senator who would say enough, do impartial justice as their oath required, and convict the president.
And there was. Mitt Romney. The senator from Utah showed a level of moral courage that validated the Founders faith that we were up to the rigors of self-governance.
No one can seriously argue that President Trump has learned from this experience. This was not the first time he solicited foreign interference in his election, nor will it be the last. As we said during the trial, if left in office, the president will not stop trying to cheat in the next election until he succeeds.
We must make sure he does not.
Republican leadership in the Senate had the power to conceal the presidents full misconduct during the trial by disallowing witnesses and documents, but they cannot keep the full, ugly truth of the presidents conduct, and that of all the presidents men, from the American people. Not for long.
Because of the impeachment process, voters can now stand forewarned of the lengths to which the president will go to try to secure his reelection, violating the law and undermining our national security and that of our allies.
By denying the American people a fair trial, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also deprived the president of something that he desperately sought exoneration. There can be no exoneration without a legitimate trial. Out of fear of what they would learn, the Senate refused to hold one. The president will not be vindicated, and neither will the Senate, certainly not by history.
The Constitution is a wondrous document, but it is not self-effectuating; it requires vigilance, and a pledge by every new generation of voters and public servants to safeguard and fulfill its lofty promise. And it requires a kind of courage that Robert F. Kennedy once said is more rare than that on the battlefield moral courage. Without it, no constitution can save us, but with it, no hardship can overcome us. We remain committed to doing everything in our power to preserve this marvelous experiment in self-governance.'>>>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/house-managers-trump-wont-be-vindicated-the-senate-wont-be-either/2020/02/05/1df7bea0-485c-11ea-8124-0ca81effcdfb_story.html
babylonsister
(171,036 posts)Aussie105
(5,334 posts)Any legitimate legal system in the world would rule a court hearing that was run without evidence in terms of documents or witnesses, as illegitimate.
Trump was impeached.
The Senate hearing was rigged. Because of this, any conclusion from the Senate is null and void.
He has NOT been vindicated. He has NOT been un-impeached.
Perhaps, some time in the future, when the Senate is more balanced politically and sanity prevails, we can have a rerun?
With evidence, with witnesses this time around.
Karma. America needs some.
no_hypocrisy
(46,038 posts)In law, there isn't such a thing as innocence. Either there's enough evidence to convict or there isn't.
Trump will go down in history as suspect but not proven guilty by way of jury nullification.