Margaret Sullivan of the Washington Post writes:
"We need to abandon neutrality-at-all-costs journalism, to replace it with something more suited to the moment. Call it Fairness First."
"Im talking about the kind of fairness that serves the public by describing the world we report on in honest and direct terms not the phony kind of fairness that tries to duck out of difficult decisions by giving both sides of an argument equal time, regardless of their truth or merit." https://www.washingtonpost.com/
/66a3fc48-5425-11ea-9e47-59
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)Cosmocat
(14,561 posts)nm
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)It's definitely worthwhile to read the entire article!
empedocles
(15,751 posts)KPN
(15,642 posts)Karadeniz
(22,492 posts)One ramification. In these times, journalists need to be clear as to what that one truth is.
CBHagman
(16,984 posts)Almost two years back she had a piece on the notion of the "truth sandwich" (Credit George Lakoff). It's about the media's difficulty (and at times outright failure) to adjust to reporting on someone who not only attempts to control the narrative, usually via tweet, but also lies brazenly, unashamedly, continually, reflexively.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/instead-of-trumps-propaganda-how-about-a-nice-truth-sandwich/2018/06/15/80df8c36-70af-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html
Instead of treating [Trump's] every tweet and utterance true or false as newsworthy (and then perhaps fact-checking it later), Lakoff urges the use of what he calls a truth sandwich.
First, he says, get as close to the overall, big-picture truth as possible right away. (Thus the gist of the Trump-in-Singapore story: Little of substance was accomplished in the summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, despite the pageantry.) Then report what Trump is claiming about it: achievement of world peace. And then, in the same story or broadcast, fact-check his claims.
Thats the truth sandwich reality, spin, reality all in one tasty, democracy-nourishing meal.