Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,922 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 01:24 PM Apr 2020

Press giving Trump's 2020 chances too much credit

By Daniel W. Drezner / Special to The Washington Post

Over the weekend, I read a lot of analysis about what the Trump administration was thinking and doing about reelection. What all of this analysis had in common was a refusal to acknowledge some brute facts.

My personal favorite is this headline on an Associated Press story: “Coronavirus could complicate Trump’s path to reelection.” I know the AP is as strait-laced as possible in its coverage, and to be fair, the story is straightforward in describing Trump’s challenges come November. Still, this is equivalent to a headline on Dec. 8, 1941, saying: “Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor could complicate America First’s desire for isolationism.”

The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post all ran stories over the weekend covering the Trump campaign’s belief that it can attack Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, as being soft on China. One Trump spokesperson told the Los Angeles Times’s Eli Stokols and Janet Hook that internal research “shows that Joe Biden’s softness on China is a major vulnerability.” The Times’ Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman report that “while Mr. Trump’s team knows that his own words will be used against him, they believe they can contrast his history favorably with that of Mr. Biden.”

The Post’s Michael Scherer, Josh Dawsey, Annie Linskey and Toluse Olorunnipa have the most jaw-dropping opening: “President Trump’s campaign is preparing to launch a broad effort aimed at linking Joe Biden to China, after concluding that it would be more politically effective than defending or promoting Trump’s response to the coronavirus pandemic.”

All of these stories are interesting but nonetheless contain an air of unreality about them. They assume that the Trump campaign’s gambits can somehow alter the trajectory of the general-election campaign. The thing is, Biden is going to have a pretty easy rejoinder to Trump about being soft on China. Furthermore, as Martin and Haberman note in their story, “Eager to continue trade talks, uneasy about further rattling the markets and hungry to protect his relationship with President Xi Jinping … Mr. Trump has repeatedly muddied Republican efforts to fault China.”

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/commentary-press-giving-trumps-2020-chances-too-much-credit/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Press giving Trump's 2020 chances too much credit (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2020 OP
Always playing up the horse race. Laelth Apr 2020 #1
or the author is underestimating the pettiness, stupidity and apathy of many voters. Thomas Hurt Apr 2020 #2
This is a great article Gothmog Apr 2020 #3

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
1. Always playing up the horse race.
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 01:28 PM
Apr 2020

It’s hard to blame them. They live off of ratings, but I, for about a year, have been arguing that Daffy Duck could beat Donald Trump if Daffy ran as a Democrat in November 2020. I am now, more than ever, convinced that I am right.

-Laelth

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
2. or the author is underestimating the pettiness, stupidity and apathy of many voters.
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 01:29 PM
Apr 2020

It is still way to early to be thinking we got the Pig beat.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Press giving Trump's 2020...