Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
Sat May 2, 2020, 02:17 AM May 2020

Nazification of the GOP Is Why There's Serious Discussion of Killing Off The 'Unfit'

Last edited Sat May 2, 2020, 12:38 PM - Edit history (3)

"Trump's Nazification of The GOP Is Why There's Serious Discussion of Killing Off The Unfit," by SemDem, Daily Kos, May 1, 2020.

Under Donald Trump, the Republican Party is racing toward a transformation that mimics the greatest evil of the 20th century. Long before the Nazis fully engaged with genocidal murder against the Jews, there were persecutions of people deemed "unfit." These were people whom Adolf Hitler’s extremists arbitrarily deemed insufficiently able to contribute to the greater German society. They included the infirm, people with learning disabilities, the mentally ill, those suffering from epilepsy, the physically disabled, and those struggling with alcohol issues.

According to the Nazis' white supremacist ideology, those people were not only impediments to their quest in perfecting their master race, but were also economic burdens to society. The Nazis started a campaign of propaganda to mock them. They were called "unworthy of life” and labeled as "useless eaters." The propaganda even expanded to math textbooks, which were revised to include arithmetic problems on how much it costs to care for these undesirables. This was the first stage. Then the Nazis moved to the next stage; they worked with political and medical authorities to divide communities between who they deemed as the “fit” and “unfit” members. The arbitrary classification system would serve a deadly purpose.



- 'Very fine people' at the deadly Nazi rally in Charlottesville, Va. in 2017.

This ultimately led to the final stage: the systematic, targeted killing of those labeled as a burden. At that point, the Nazis had groomed the German population by getting a little bit worse every single day—just enough to normalize the inhumanity. By the time the Nazis reached this stage, the populace had gotten so used to the cruelties, it seemed like murder of “the weak” was simply the next logical step. They had justified it in their minds.

-> *Sacrifice the weak was the policy of Aktion T4, the Nazi euthanasia program that exterminated the disabled. https://t.co/cxIq22R2n3 — Dylan (@dyllyp) April 22, 2020



*NOTE the sign, "Sacrifice the Weak" - the Nazi Aktion T4 eugenics slogan.




The concept of social Darwinism and arbitrary human classification is based upon Friedrich Nietzsche's Übermensch theory of superhumans. These are people not impeded by the needs of others deemed inferior. The weaker humans—characterized as the burdens of society—are to be left to fend for themselves. Hitler used this theory as the ideological foundation for his belief in a master race. Another person known to borrow heavily from this theory is the prophet of American conservatism, author Ayn Rand. Born, raised, and educated in Russia, Rand’s entire philosophy is centered around the concept of individual supremacy and radical free market fundamentalism. Rand and her ilk applied the Übermensch theory to capitalism, which justifies the wealthy’s belief that they have an absolute right to plunder. She called it ”the virtue of selfishness.” Her philosophy was simple: The weak are weak and should be taken advantage of, because it is the natural order of things. Therefore, society needs to focus only on developing the strong, and allow the weak to suffer or die.

Rand’s theory did not spare anyone, even children. Two years before her death in 1982, she appeared on Phil Donahue’s eponymous talk show to explain why it was wrong for our government to ever consider the needs of “subnormal” children and the “handicapped.” ...Ayn Rand isn’t the sole driving force behind the right-wing’s belief in their superiority over others, but she is probably the most direct and honest about it—and the Grand Old Party loves her for it. Rand’s brand of social Darwinism can be found in the right-wing support of eliminating social safety nets for the poor in order to support massive tax breaks and subsidies for the top 1% of the wealthiest Americans. It’s this sort of mindset that forces the poor in this nation to fight for the crumbs that rarely trickle-down. (*SEE Interview Video Below).

Randian capitalism hit the mainstream in the 1980s. It was the Reagan era, when a new crop of right-wing devotees adopted the principle that good governance, which is supposed to work toward the collective good, was no longer an ideal. Conservatives during this timeframe focused heavily on deregulation for big business, giving tax cuts to the richest Americans, and ending antitrust protections against monopolies. Ever since, Republicans have retooled their party to only serve the interests of the ultra-rich. Their destructive policies on everything—from education, health care, and shifting the tax burden away from the wealthy—has made U.S. income inequality the highest it’s been since the Census started tracking it over a half-century ago.
You would be hard-pressed to find any Republican today who doesn’t speak fondly of Ayn Rand. White House officials like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo pay homage to her ideals. Former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said he got into politics because of her. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul was even named after her by his father, former presidential candidate Ron Paul. But it’s Donald Trump—infamously known for hating to read—who said that The Fountainhead was one of his favorite books of all time, because it glorified the alpha male capitalist who had no regard for human consequence...

Read More, https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/5/1/1934455/-Trump-s-Nazification-of-the-GOP-is-why-there-s-serious-discussion-of-killing-off-the-unfit?utm_campaign=trending

- Aktion T4, Nazi Euthanasia Program, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktion_T4



- Nazi poster c. 1938: "60,000 Reichsmark is what this person suffering from a hereditary illness costs the People's community during his lifetime. Fellow citizen, that is your money too."




- (3 mins.). Ayn Rand on 'subnormal' children & the handicapped, interview with Phil Donahue, 1982.

AYN RAND: “The newest proposals of having special, millions spent on subnormal children and on the handicapped. You are getting the so-called "needing" [school] buses is the attempt to bring everybody to the level of the handicapped. [...] But it includes the mentally retarded which is the subnormal, which is the children who are unable to learn, so that at the end of spending thousands or millions of taxpayers’ money, you're left with a half-idiot who MAY learn to read and write. MAY.”
She goes on to explain how she values some human lives over others … to applause.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nazification of the GOP Is Why There's Serious Discussion of Killing Off The 'Unfit' (Original Post) appalachiablue May 2020 OP
K&R! SheltieLover May 2020 #1
"Subnormal" ... Jopin Klobe May 2020 #2
Thank you! Buckeye_Democrat May 2020 #3
To be fair, it was not unanimous applause ms liberty May 2020 #4
I'm in no mood to be fair, as far as Ayn Rand is concerned. Paladin May 2020 #5
To Ayn Rand herself I agree, but that is not who I was referencing in my comment about being fair ms liberty May 2020 #7
I didn't know she was a Nazi! Trueblue Texan May 2020 #6
Now I recall the stamp, it's disturbing how widespread appalachiablue May 2020 #9
What I don't get is why many who could land in those 'unfit' categories still love them some Trump. tanyev May 2020 #8

Jopin Klobe

(779 posts)
2. "Subnormal" ...
Sat May 2, 2020, 03:42 AM
May 2020

... my, she did like to on about herself ...

... hey Ayynie ...

... how'd all that Social Security 'socialism' work out for ya in your declining-worse-than-you-already-were years? ...

... sweet, sweet gubmint money, hunh Ayynie? ...

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,852 posts)
3. Thank you!
Sat May 2, 2020, 03:57 AM
May 2020

I actually bought into Ayn Rand’s nonsense for about a year in high school (the 80’s).

Part of it could’ve been “rebellion” against my liberal parents?

I still believe in meritocracy, but Ayn Rand’s trick was to equate merit and ability with money. It didn’t take long to realize that’s not how it works, although the wealthy can often delude themselves into thinking that way.

Her heartless attitude, which became more apparent to me over time, was another big turn-off. Everyone deserves the rewards of civilization, not just a few at the top.

ms liberty

(8,558 posts)
4. To be fair, it was not unanimous applause
Sat May 2, 2020, 07:09 AM
May 2020

The part of the audience on the screen is looking at the other side of the room like a 1982 version of "WTF?" LOL.
I may have seen this show then or part of it, I used to watch Donahue religiously. I kept up with current affairs and voted, but was not into politics at all though, so I might have switched channels. What an unpleasant woman she was!

Paladin

(28,243 posts)
5. I'm in no mood to be fair, as far as Ayn Rand is concerned.
Sat May 2, 2020, 07:48 AM
May 2020

Now, or ever more.

I'm glad these puke-worthy comments of hers were posted, though.

ms liberty

(8,558 posts)
7. To Ayn Rand herself I agree, but that is not who I was referencing in my comment about being fair
Sat May 2, 2020, 08:47 AM
May 2020

I was noting that not everyone in the audience thought it was applause worthy. I'm thinking now of finding and watching the whole episode, because hey, I'm stuck at home anyway, right? It would be educational and a trip down memory lane at the same time - the hair - the clothes! I would really be interested to see how the audience reacted through the whole show and what questions she got from them. If I can stand to sit through it, anyway...

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
9. Now I recall the stamp, it's disturbing how widespread
Sat May 2, 2020, 11:36 AM
May 2020

her Objectivist theory and libertarianism have become in the last 30-40 years, as stated in the article.

Rand's pro Nazi, (twisted) Social Darwinism and survival of the fittest 'ubermensch' views are odd esp. since her family was Russian-Jewish. But during the Russian Rev. when she was a teen, her family's business was confiscated and they had to flee according to Wiki, that's a big reason why she became a fanatic. Later on she also said she believed in reason, not faith.

Wiki. Rand was born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum on February 2, 1905, to a Russian-Jewish bourgeois family living in Saint Petersburg. She was the eldest of three daughters of Zinovy Zakharovich Rosenbaum and Anna Borisovna (née Kaplan). Her father was upwardly mobile and a pharmacist and her mother was socially ambitious and religiously observant. Rand later said she found school unchallenging and began writing screenplays at the age of eight and novels at the age of ten...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Nazification of the GOP I...