Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Trump's Use of the Military Does Not Create the "Appearance" of Abuse. It Is Abuse.
And the message that West Point cadets simply ignore their commander in chief is illogical.
By DAHLIA LITHWICK
JUNE 12, 20205:42 PM
There is a funny moment in an otherwise striking apology from Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In a prerecorded speech for the National Defense University commencement ceremony Thursday, Milley flatly said that he should not have been there, referring to his appearance beside the president in a photo-op at Lafayette Square. He was responding to a growing fissure between the Trump administration and the U.S. military, and he went on to say that his appearance, in full military dress, immediately after federal authorities had forcibly removed peaceful protesters from the square, was inappropriate: As many of you saw the results of the photograph of me in Lafayette Square last week, that sparked a national debate about the role of the military in civil society, Milley said. I should not have been there. My presence in that moment, and in that environment, created the perception of the military involved in domestic politics. The funny moment? Its his use of the word perception.
What exactly was Milleys role here? He let himself be invoked in a phone call earlier that day, between President Donald Trump and governors from around the country, as Trump urged them to dominate the streets. Trump announced that Milley, the highest-ranking officer in the U.S. military, would be in charge, and then we all saw his jaunt through Lafayette Square in battle fatigues. Which means this was not about a perception of the military injected into domestic politics but about the actual fact of the military injected into domestic politics. The fact that Milley has come to regret and deplore his role in the chilling set piece doesnt change the fact that for a few hours on June 1, Donald Trump sought to have the National Guard, the 82nd Airborne Division, a Black Hawk, and a Lakota helicopter quell a peaceful protest, and that some of those actions actually came to pass as the military scrambled to mollify him.
I raise this not to vilify Milley, now one of many military leaders who has found himself in the unenviable position of having to explain why so very many military leaders have succumbed to Trumps most violent, unconstitutional, and malevolent impulses, and ended up having to apologize for them later. After all, we witnessed in the days after the brinksmanship at Lafayette Square the spectacle of Defense Secretary Mark Esper and former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis calling out the use of the military for domestic political purposes. Mattis implicitly accused Milley of allowing troops to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizensmuch less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. And in the days following Mattis broadside, we have seen members of the military break with the president over removal of the names of Confederate leaders from military bases, and a letter posted Thursday on Medium, from hundreds of West Point alumni warning the Class of 2020, to whom Trump will be delivering an address on Saturday, to uphold its oath to the Constitution and not to a political leader. So fragile is this moment between the commander in chief and the military that the president now claims that when he told governors last week to dominate the streets he really meant that he intended to have them dominate with force and compassion. What we saw happen on Lafayette Square wasnt a problem of perceptionit was a problem of reality, a reality that was swiftly and thankfully revoked and regretted, yes, but a reality nonetheless.
Heather Digby Parton gets at the meat of the problem when she notes that this episode illustrates one of the ongoing destructive dynamics of the Trump administration. The president makes mad demands and, in order to keep him from doing his worst, people around him appease him with flattery or come up with slightly less bad options and then scurry to carry them out. The result, she writes is that in the process, so many of them destroy their credibility and their reputations. Even if they succeed in short-circuiting the very worst of Trumps impulses, their willingness to appease him always produces bad outcomes anyway. But I would go one further: Its not simply that Trump keeps taking us to the very brink of constitutional crisis at which point the people around him manage to mitigate the worst of it while destroying their own careers and reputations in the process. Its that time and time again we actually cross the brink into constitutional crisis, and then comfort ourselves with claims that it never actually happened, or that it just appeared to have happened.
More:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/06/trump-military-relationship-west-point.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 888 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's Use of the Military Does Not Create the "Appearance" of Abuse. It Is Abuse. (Original Post)
Judi Lynn
Jun 2020
OP
leftieNanner
(15,100 posts)1. Dahlia is an excellent journalist
The problem with this administration is that we are trying to hold on to political norms in this country that are about five stations back on this trolley line. We don't really know what to do with him! (Aside from the House of Representatives impeaching him, but I digress.) He doesn't understand government or, really, even politics. No one in his entire life has ever told him NO! So he has run roughshod over our entire country because he is a stupid narcissist who is drunk on the power of the Presidency.
I don't exactly know how we will survive these next 4.5 months (and then the 2.5 months before the Biden inauguration) as he ratchets up the crazy.
SMDH