Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Celebrate George Orwell's birthday by reading his (scathing) 1940 review of Mein Kampf
Celebrate George Orwells birthday by reading his (scathing) 1940 review of Mein Kampf
.
Dan Sheehan
By Dan Sheehan
June 25, 2020, 2:18pm
One year after the Nazis invaded Czechoslovakia (and a full year before the New York Times decided it was a good idea to publish an excerpt from Der Führers poisonous opus), celebrated writer, literary critic, and vocal opponent of totalitarianism George Orwell (who was born 107 years ago today) reviewed Mein Kampf.
He was, as you can imagine, not a fan.
As Orwell notes right off the bat, a previous edition of autobiographypublished just a year beforeseemed invested in presenting Hitler, despite the laundry list of atrocities he had already carried out, in as kindly a light as possible:
[...]
.
Dan Sheehan
By Dan Sheehan
June 25, 2020, 2:18pm
One year after the Nazis invaded Czechoslovakia (and a full year before the New York Times decided it was a good idea to publish an excerpt from Der Führers poisonous opus), celebrated writer, literary critic, and vocal opponent of totalitarianism George Orwell (who was born 107 years ago today) reviewed Mein Kampf.
He was, as you can imagine, not a fan.
As Orwell notes right off the bat, a previous edition of autobiographypublished just a year beforeseemed invested in presenting Hitler, despite the laundry list of atrocities he had already carried out, in as kindly a light as possible:
It is a sign of the speed at which events are moving that Hurst and Blacketts unexpurgated edition of Mein Kampf, published only a year ago, is edited from a pro-Hitler angle. The obvious intention of the translators preface and notes is to tone down the books ferocity and present Hitler in as kindly a light as possible. For at that date Hitler was still respectable. He had crushed the German labour movement, and for that the property-owning classes were willing to forgive him almost anything. Both Left and Right concurred in the very shallow notion that National Socialism was merely a version of Conservatism.
[...]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1257 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Celebrate George Orwell's birthday by reading his (scathing) 1940 review of Mein Kampf (Original Post)
sl8
Jun 2020
OP
I think his term "property owning classes" really strikes at the heart of current rethugs
captain queeg
Jun 2020
#1
captain queeg
(10,188 posts)1. I think his term "property owning classes" really strikes at the heart of current rethugs
As long as they can get theirs they are ok with anything because they live in a different, parallel society.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. The plurall 'classes' gives the phrase a lot of 'reach'.
Igel
(35,300 posts)3. You'd like his
"What is fascism?" just a year later, then.
Since then, sadly, the word "fascism" has only broadened its meaning.
Lord Ludd
(585 posts)4. Article got Orwell's (nee Eric Blair) DOB wrong
He was born 117 years ago (1903).