Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Dee Evans, HuffPo: "Obama Can't Use Bin Laden but Bush Could Use Saddam and 9/11 -- Really?"
Obama Can't Use Bin Laden but Bush Could Use Saddam and 9/11 -- Really?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dee-evans/obama-bin-laden-ad_b_1466111.html?ref=media&ir=Media
Dee Evans
Political Junkie and Chamber of Commerce Exec
Posted: 05/ 1/2012 8:55 pm
Are you kidding me? Seriously, are you kidding me? Actual, legitimate media pundits and political professionals are really asking if President Obama should tout the killing of Osama bin Laden during his re-election campaign? Really... seriously???
I honestly don't know where to start. These are some of the same people who sat around jack-legged while George W. Bush flew a fighter jet onto an air craft carrier with a jumbo red, white and blue banner noting "Mission Accomplished" (9 years ago mind you) after single-handedly dismantling the Middle East with a "go-it-alone" war in Iraq.
These are some of the same people who sat around tongue-tied while Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their band of merry men walked our country straight into a bloody war where thousands of our troops were killed and trillions of dollars lost looking for weapons that didn't exist.
These are some of the same people who happily reported on each and every instance of Bush and Cheney (and let's not forget dear Rudy G.) citing September 11 in campaign ad after campaign ad and I don't remember hearing a ringing media chorus of "is this appropriate?" (What's even more disheartening is that Bush's people are STILL claiming that Bush kept the country safe and very few ever correct them on the little fact that 9/11 did happen on their watch in 2001, ergo, they DID NOT keep the country safe!)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dee-evans/obama-bin-laden-ad_b_1466111.html?ref=media&ir=Media
Dee Evans
Political Junkie and Chamber of Commerce Exec
Posted: 05/ 1/2012 8:55 pm
Are you kidding me? Seriously, are you kidding me? Actual, legitimate media pundits and political professionals are really asking if President Obama should tout the killing of Osama bin Laden during his re-election campaign? Really... seriously???
I honestly don't know where to start. These are some of the same people who sat around jack-legged while George W. Bush flew a fighter jet onto an air craft carrier with a jumbo red, white and blue banner noting "Mission Accomplished" (9 years ago mind you) after single-handedly dismantling the Middle East with a "go-it-alone" war in Iraq.
These are some of the same people who sat around tongue-tied while Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their band of merry men walked our country straight into a bloody war where thousands of our troops were killed and trillions of dollars lost looking for weapons that didn't exist.
These are some of the same people who happily reported on each and every instance of Bush and Cheney (and let's not forget dear Rudy G.) citing September 11 in campaign ad after campaign ad and I don't remember hearing a ringing media chorus of "is this appropriate?" (What's even more disheartening is that Bush's people are STILL claiming that Bush kept the country safe and very few ever correct them on the little fact that 9/11 did happen on their watch in 2001, ergo, they DID NOT keep the country safe!)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1652 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dee Evans, HuffPo: "Obama Can't Use Bin Laden but Bush Could Use Saddam and 9/11 -- Really?" (Original Post)
Amerigo Vespucci
May 2012
OP
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)1. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
We really shouldn't be surprised by it any longer.
movingviolation
(310 posts)2. Damned librul media.
otohara
(24,135 posts)3. Oh Dee, Didn't You Forget Someone?
The Pundit Lady & owner of the HuffPost?
usrname
(398 posts)4. Another example of
IOKIYAAR
Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)5. Bush (R). Obama (D). Don't you get the difference?
(R) can do anything and the owners will like it because (R) gives the owners more power.
(D) tries to equalize power and the owners don't like that.
Get with the program here!!!!