The Inside Story of the Mueller Probe's Mistakes In a new book, Andrew Weissmann
The Inside Story of the Mueller Probes Mistakes:
In a new book, Andrew Weissmann, one of Special Counsel Robert Muellers top deputies, lays out the limits and letdowns of the years-long Russia investigation.
https://www.theatlantic.com/
Andrew Weissmann was one of Robert Muellers top deputies in the special counsels investigation of the 2016 election, and hes about to publish the first insider account, called Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation.
"The Special Counsels Office also worked under the constant threat that Trump would fire Mueller, as Richard Nixon had fired Archibald Cox, the first Watergate special prosecutor, in the Saturday Night Massacre. Trump tried several times to get rid of Mueller, but he was stopped by his underlings, who knew that it would lead to legal and political disaster. Still, the threat never went away, and in the end, it served the presidents interests well: The specter of our being shut down exerted a kind of destabilizing pull on our decision-making process. Where Law Ends describes numerous instances, large and small, when Mueller declined to pursue an aggressive course for fear of the reaction at the White House."
"Had we given it our allhad we used all available tools to uncover the truth, undeterred by the onslaught of the presidents unique powers to undermine our efforts? Weissmann writes in the introduction. I know the hard answer to that simple question: We could have done more. Elsewhere, he admits that, like Congress, we were guilty of not pressing as hard as we could for evidence. He calls a crucial passage of the Mueller report mealymouthedan easy mark for Barrs treachery. Part of the reason the president and his enablers were able to spin the report was that we had left the playing field open for them to do so.
dem4decades
(11,270 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,569 posts)to bypass certain crimes like money ties with Russia.
GopherGal
(2,007 posts)Apparently there were like 6 people in the whole US who didn't realize Trump's acolytes would refuse to cooperate with the investigation in hope of being rewarded with a pardon, and all 6 were working for Mueller.
dem4decades
(11,270 posts)Bradshaw3
(7,488 posts)Many on here, including me, got attacked for criticizing him. As we learn more about the backstory we learn how wrong they were. He was even worse than I thought and our country may never be the same because of it.
SunSeeker
(51,522 posts)But I don't get how anyone could defend his conclusion that Trump did not conspire with the Russians, and his decision to not insist on an interview with Trump and Don Jr.
Anyone who actually read the report should be furious. I sure was. Mueller determined there was no conspiracy with the Russians because he claimed it was too hard to put a value on the dirt (stolen emails) that Trump got against Hillary. So he assigned it ZERO value. Thus, Mueller concluded Trump did not exchange things of value with the Russians because what he got from the Russians was worth zero. So he found no conspiracy. Idiotic sophistry.
Bradshaw3
(7,488 posts)Toobin on CNN said Mueller was boxing by the rules whereas Barr and drumpf were street brawlers, and he wasn't ready for them. I think that may be generous to Mueller, but whatever it was he wasn't up to the job.