Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BigmanPigman

(51,569 posts)
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 07:51 PM Sep 2020

The Inside Story of the Mueller Probe's Mistakes In a new book, Andrew Weissmann

The Inside Story of the Mueller Probe’s Mistakes:
In a new book, Andrew Weissmann, one of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s top deputies, lays out the limits and letdowns of the years-long Russia investigation.

https://www.theatlantic.com/

Andrew Weissmann was one of Robert Mueller’s top deputies in the special counsel’s investigation of the 2016 election, and he’s about to publish the first insider account, called Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation.

"The Special Counsel’s Office also worked under the constant threat that Trump would fire Mueller, as Richard Nixon had fired Archibald Cox, the first Watergate special prosecutor, in the Saturday Night Massacre. Trump tried several times to get rid of Mueller, but he was stopped by his underlings, who knew that it would lead to legal and political disaster. Still, the threat never went away, and in the end, it served the president’s interests well: “The specter of our being shut down exerted a kind of destabilizing pull on our decision-making process.” Where Law Ends describes numerous instances, large and small, when Mueller declined to pursue an aggressive course for fear of the reaction at the White House."

"Had we given it our all—had we used all available tools to uncover the truth, undeterred by the onslaught of the president’s unique powers to undermine our efforts?” Weissmann writes in the introduction. “I know the hard answer to that simple question: We could have done more.” Elsewhere, he admits that, “like Congress, we were guilty of not pressing as hard as we could” for evidence. He calls a crucial passage of the Mueller report “mealymouthed”—an easy mark for Barr’s treachery. “Part of the reason the president and his enablers were able to spin the report was that we had left the playing field open for them to do so.”

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BigmanPigman

(51,569 posts)
2. Rosenstein is also guilty of steering the investigation
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 07:57 PM
Sep 2020

to bypass certain crimes like money ties with Russia.

GopherGal

(2,007 posts)
3. one of the blurbs I read about his was they expected more cooperation from witnesses.
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 08:02 PM
Sep 2020

Apparently there were like 6 people in the whole US who didn't realize Trump's acolytes would refuse to cooperate with the investigation in hope of being rewarded with a pardon, and all 6 were working for Mueller.

Bradshaw3

(7,488 posts)
5. A lot of people on here have defended Mueller
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 08:44 PM
Sep 2020

Many on here, including me, got attacked for criticizing him. As we learn more about the backstory we learn how wrong they were. He was even worse than I thought and our country may never be the same because of it.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
6. I started criticizing him as soon as I read his report. Like you, I was attacked for that.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 12:55 AM
Sep 2020

But I don't get how anyone could defend his conclusion that Trump did not conspire with the Russians, and his decision to not insist on an interview with Trump and Don Jr.

Anyone who actually read the report should be furious. I sure was. Mueller determined there was no conspiracy with the Russians because he claimed it was too hard to put a value on the dirt (stolen emails) that Trump got against Hillary. So he assigned it ZERO value. Thus, Mueller concluded Trump did not exchange things of value with the Russians because what he got from the Russians was worth zero. So he found no conspiracy. Idiotic sophistry.

Bradshaw3

(7,488 posts)
7. Excellent description
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 10:23 AM
Sep 2020

Toobin on CNN said Mueller was boxing by the rules whereas Barr and drumpf were street brawlers, and he wasn't ready for them. I think that may be generous to Mueller, but whatever it was he wasn't up to the job.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Inside Story of the M...