The Crown isn't making the royal family look bad. They do a fine job of that themselves
The Crown isnt making the royal family look bad. They do a fine job of that themselves
Catherine Bennett
Whatever the guild of royal experts says, Peter Morgans series cant match the truth of its unlovely subjects
Sun 29 Nov 2020 03.30 EST
(Guardian UK) Which, below, did the Prince of Wales not say?
a) I am the Prince of Wales and I will be King!
b) I need encouragement and the occasional pat on the back too.
c) Darling, come back, of course I want to hug you.
Any accredited royal writer would know instantly that the answer is b), a line from season 4 of Peter Morgans The Crown. The first quote was aimed by a tantruming Charles, along with a book, at Paul Burrell. I can still see its fluttering pages whirring through the air, Burrell wrote in A Royal Duty. Quote c) is from The Housekeepers Diary by Wendy Berry, a book banned in the UK. In 1986, she wrote, Diana was still making an effort to be loving and affectionate to her husband.
....(snip)....
Fellow Charlesite Penny Junor thinks the dramatisation is over-indebted to Diana. How easy it is to be seduced, she writes, into thinking what we see on screen is what really happened and this is what members of the royal family really said to one another. Though, equally, how easy it is, when such royal authorities assemble, to forget that some of the deadliest lines Charless whatever in love means are verbatim.
....(snip)....
Since this is the second time in a month (following the Martin Bashir revelations) that royal commentators have felt compelled to move more or less en bloc against an outsider whose methods they deplore, the creation of some sort of organised guild or union is surely overdue. Royal specialists have for years taken sides, but this was always, you gathered, undertaken regretfully, professionally, out of virtually Baghottian reverence for the institution at risk. No passionate Diana or Charles advocate or adversary ever intended by their partiality to expose the entire royal family, as The Crown relentlessly does, as cruel, spoilt and silly, essentially a collection of pitiful victims. .............(more)
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/nov/29/the-crown-isnt-making-british-royal-family-look-bad-they-do-that-themselves
AZ8theist
(5,456 posts)While Gillian Anderson was a good selection as a Margaret Thatcher look alike, her acting was atrocious.
There were plenty of other disappointments as well. Seasons 1-3 were much better.
marmar
(77,073 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)I really liked Claire foys Queen. The third season recast everyone. Not really anybody to pity in any character. I just thank God for William and Kate who may just save the monarch afterall.
Freddie
(9,259 posts)Which would focus on William and Harry up to present day. Yay!!
jimfields33
(15,769 posts)CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)Seasons 5 and 6 are already in the works and they might add 1 more.
CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)heckles65
(549 posts)Having gone through the first two seasons and am halfway through the third, they seem like a pretty ordinary couple whose marriage has had its ups and downs. The queen is very devoted to her work even though she's emphatic she would have been happier being a horse breeder. If William and Kate do as well, the monarchy should have no problems.
The one person who was made to look thoroughly bad was Lord Mountbatten, discussing a military coup with the Bank of England inner circle, only to be talked down by the Queen in no uncertain terms. I did some reading afterward, the whole idea of a coup (whether assisted by Mountbatten or not) seems to be 25% supported 75% conjecture. Of course, all the alleged plotters are long dead, and Her Majesty isn't talking.
There was quite a bit of discussion on my gaming group about it. Some people thought history is far kinder toward Mountbatten than ought to be the case.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)Love the show, but I also accept the fact its not a historical document.