Trump's Non-Vindication - WSJ Editorial
The Senate failed Saturday to convict Donald Trump on the single House impeachment article of inciting an insurrection, but the 57-43 vote was no vindication. The statements by Senators who voted to acquit make clear that he escaped conviction mainlyperhaps onlybecause he is no longer President. Seven Republicans joined every Democrat in the most bipartisan conviction vote in history. While short of the 67 votes needed to convict, most Republicans didnt defend Mr. Trumps words or actions on Jan. 6 or his attempts to overturn the election. As weve written before, Mr. Trumps behavior was inexcusable and will mar his legacy for all time.
That was the essence of Sen. Mitch McConnells post-trial remarks. The GOP leader voted against conviction but explicitly because he said the Constitution reserves the impeachment power only for Presidents while in office. Scholars disagree on this point, and there are good arguments on both sides. Mr. McConnell leaned on the writing of the 19th-century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. But he also noted that impeaching a private citizen had no limiting principle, and could set a dangerous precedent.
(snip)
He added that the rioters had been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earthbecause he was angry hed lost an election. All of this was compounded by Mr. Trumps failure to act with dispatch to call off the rioters once he heard what was happening. Mr. Trumps defenders blame Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the District of Columbia government for lack of preparedness. Some of the riot leaders may also have pre-planned the assault, and there is much police still havent disclosed.
But none of that absolves Mr. Trump for refusing for hours to ask his supporters to stand down. Mr. Trumps Jan. 6 early-afternoon comments to House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy dismissing a plea to call off the rioters, as related second-hand by GOP Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, are further evidence of Mr. Trumps dereliction. As Mr. McConnell also noted, Senate acquittal does not absolve Mr. Trump of potential criminal or civil liability for actions he took in office.
(snip)
Mr. Trump may run again, but he wont win another national election. He lost re-election before the events of Jan. 6, and as President his job approval never rose above 50%. He may go on a revenge campaign tour, or run as a third-party candidate, but all he will accomplish is to divide the center-right and elect Democrats. The GOPs defeats in the two Jan. 5 Georgia Senate races proved that. The country is moving past the Trump Presidency, and the GOP will remain in the wilderness until it does too.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-non-vindication-11613342554 (subscription)
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Thanks for posting this.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)No, there is no valid excuse for the behavior of delaying the trial, then saying that you can't have a trial because you delayed it.