How Republicans misunderstand the 2020 turnout story
Numerous Republican state legislatures are trying to pass new voter restriction legislation (e.g. limiting absentee and early voting). Meanwhile, Democrats in Congress are trying to pass laws that expand access to the ballot box.
The moves from both camps come after an election with record turnout in which there were multiple false charges of fraud by prominent Republicans like former President Donald Trump.
But we should be clear: high turnout had little to do with why Trump ended up being a one-term president. Trump lost because he was an unusually unpopular president, and he likely would have been defeated if turnout looked like it did in 2016.
During his term in office, Trump's approval rating never climbed over 50% in the national polls. In the leadup to the 2020 election, his approval rating was stuck in the low- to mid-40s. The last president to overcome such daunting numbers was Harry Truman in 1948.
-more-
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-republicans-misunderstand-the-2020-turnout-story/ar-BB1el4jn?li=BBnb7Kz
thx64536
(47 posts)A lot of people dropped their registration in the Republican party in January. It will be interesting to see how it shows up in 2022.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)An example (one of 3, all poorly explained):
(The state exit polls in the three closest states with a 2016 recall vote, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, has an average shift of 0 points as well.)
That's it, the total explanation for one piece of their evidence.
Hardly compelling.
stopdiggin
(11,248 posts)had voted Hillary -- Trump loses. If the people who stayed home in 2016 voted -- Trump loses big.
And -- if people that didn't vote in 2016 didn't turn out big -- Trump wins in 2020.
Republican party has been clearly losing demographics for the last 30 years. They're well aware of this fact. And that -- and not 2020 -- is why Republicans are doubling down on voting restrictions. Don't think it has anything to do with "misunderstanding."