Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hue

(4,949 posts)
Mon May 21, 2012, 09:43 PM May 2012

The Vatican Lays a Cunning Trap for American Nuns

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-c-johnson/vatican-lays-a-cunning-trap-for-american-nuns_b_1527369.html

At the end of this month, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious will meet to formulate a response to a Vatican trap whose cunning is best appreciated within the long tradition of religious authorities who craft impossible dilemmas for those they perceive as threats.

Two millennia ago, the chief priests sent someone to ask Jesus, "Should we pay taxes?" If Jesus said yes, he would pit himself against Jewish resistance to Roman occupation and therefore, in Jewish eyes, against God. If he said no, the Romans could execute him for sedition. Instead, Jesus famously replied, "Render to Ceaser what is Ceaser's and to God what is God's."

In the 15th century, Joan of Arc's ecclesiastical inquisitors asked her, "Do you know yourself to be in God's grace?" If Joan answered yes, she would commit heresy because the Church had long taught that no one could be certain of being in God's grace; if no, they could interpret her answer as an admission of guilt. Joan looked them in the eyes and replied, "If I am not in God's grace, may God put me there; if I am, may God so keep me."

Today, the Vatican tells the women of the LCWR, "Submit to our oversight and control of your every action for the next five years." The Vatican's official "or else" clause remains unstated but clear to all involved. "Submit to our authority, or call yourselves Catholic no longer."
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Vatican Lays a Cunning Trap for American Nuns (Original Post) hue May 2012 OP
I hope the nuns stand up to these pricks. southernyankeebelle May 2012 #1
I don't see how it's such a "cunning trap". It's pretty obvious that SharonAnn May 2012 #7
I can't argue with that point. I wish I could. southernyankeebelle May 2012 #8
if all nuns magically turned into altar boys, provis99 May 2012 #2
"Morde me" dimbear May 2012 #3
Luke 20 rug May 2012 #4
When he said that, he must have meant the jewish priests. He certainly jerseyjack May 2012 #6
Of course he did! Retrograde May 2012 #9
who or what shall determine what constitutes fidelity to Roman Catholicism? lupulin May 2012 #5

SharonAnn

(13,771 posts)
7. I don't see how it's such a "cunning trap". It's pretty obvious that
Tue May 22, 2012, 11:13 AM
May 2012

they mean "Submit or be banned".

Bunch of bachelors in dresses trying to tell women what to do! Sheeet!

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. Luke 20
Mon May 21, 2012, 10:50 PM
May 2012

45 While all the people were listening, Jesus said to his disciples, 46 “Beware of the teachers of the law. They like to walk around in flowing robes and love to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces and have the most important seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at banquets. 47 They devour widows’ houses and for a show make lengthy prayers. These men will be punished most severely.”

 

jerseyjack

(1,361 posts)
6. When he said that, he must have meant the jewish priests. He certainly
Tue May 22, 2012, 07:26 AM
May 2012

couldn't have meant the Pope.

Retrograde

(10,128 posts)
9. Of course he did!
Tue May 22, 2012, 02:46 PM
May 2012

OK, the Jesus mentioned in Luke lived before the existence of popes or an organized church. But Jesus is, according to Catholic dogma, the second person of the Trinity and one with God, eternal and equal and identical in all things. Thus He knew that the Catholic Church and its popes would exist and have human imperfections and need admonishment. So the passage does mean the pope (or the bishops in general, of which the pope is one). There, I've run rings around you logically

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Vatican Lays a Cunnin...