Thomas S Mullaney: How China went from celebrating ethnic diversity to suppressing it
Source: The Guardian
How China went from celebrating ethnic diversity to suppressing it
The brutal clampdown in Xinjiang represents an about-face from the communist partys original approach to cultural differences
Thomas S Mullaney
Thu 10 Jun 2021 08.00 BST
Chinas mass detention of Uyghur Muslims the largest of a religio-ethnic group since the second world war is not the inevitable or predictable outcome of Chinese communist policies towards ethnic minorities. Ive spent the past 20 years studying ethnicity in China and, when viewing the present situation in Xinjiang through the prism of history, one thing becomes clear: this is not what was supposed to happen.
In the early 1950s the Chinese Communist party (CCP) was holding on to revolutionary victory by its fingernails. The postwar economy was in shambles, and the outbreak of the Korean war brought a nuclear hegemon to its doorstep, in the form of the United States. Not the moment most regimes would choose to enlarge their to-do lists. The CCP did, however, committing to officially recognising more minority peoples than any other Chinese regime in history. While Chiang Kai-sheks nationalists had begrudgingly accepted the official existence of five groups in the 1930s and 40s, the Communists recognised 55 in all (plus the Han majority), many with populations under 10,000.
A remarkable amount of time and capital was dedicated to the celebration and bolstering of these groups. Perhaps the largest social survey in human history sent thousands of researchers into minority communities, filling libraries with their reports. Linguists created writing systems for minorities who did not already have them. The scale of the Peoples Republic of Chinas investment in groups it designated as minorities has been staggering.
Heres the irony: the Chinese communists dont believe that ethnic identity truly exists not in the long run. Rooted in Marxism-Leninism, the party maintains (at least, it did) that class is the only fundamental dimension of human identity. Other collective identities, such as nationality, religion and ethnicity are long-lasting but ultimately ephemeral fictions, constructed by those at the top of the economic pyramid to distract the poor from seeking comradeship with fellow proletarians.
Why would the party invest in something it doesnt think exists? To neutralise it.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/10/china-celebrating-diversity-suppressing-xinjiang-communist-party