Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,741 posts)
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 12:57 PM Jul 2021

Yes, It's Still a Conservative Supreme Court

The Supreme Court’s October 2020 term wraps up this week, and it wasn’t as bad as some liberals may have had reason to fear. This has led some observers to question if the court is as conservative as previously assumed. Conservative and liberal are hazy, elastic terms in everyday politics, so some allowances can be made. These terms are even less useful in the context of the Supreme Court, where the justices’ judicial philosophies don’t always reflect America’s partisan divides. But by any defensible standard, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority is secure, if not fully operational.

According to preliminary statistics by SCOTUSblog, all six of the court’s conservative justices were part of majority rulings more often than their liberal colleagues. Leading the pack was Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who found himself in 97 percent of the court’s majorities this term. On the liberal side, Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer each found themselves in the majority 80 percent of the time, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor trailed at 72 percent. (All statistics in this article exclude Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee and Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, which haven’t yet been released.)

Though some of the rulings had unpredictable coalitions, there is still evidence of a strong ideological split among the justices. Justice Amy Coney Barrett voted with her conservative colleagues between 94 percent (Kavanaugh) and 84 percent (Justice Samuel Alito) of the time. By comparison, she voted with Elena Kagan 76 percent of the time, with Stephen Breyer 71 percent of the time, and with Sonia Sotomayor just 65 percent of the time. Barrett and Kavanaugh were the closest pair of justices on the court this term, followed closely by Chief Justice John Roberts and Kavanaugh at 93 percent.

In recent weeks, these shifting coalitions have given rise to the notion that the 6–3 split is really a 3–3–3 split, with Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett at the court’s center and the court’s liberals and conservatives revolving around them. It’s an elegant model—and a flawed one. For one, a justice’s first year is an imperfect indicator of their long-term voting patterns. It’s exceedingly unlikely that Barrett will end up like Justice David Souter, who drifted away from the conservatives to become a reliable member of the court’s liberal wing. But as she becomes more familiar with the court’s dynamics, and as Supreme Court litigants become more familiar with how she approaches cases, some drift could happen in either direction.

-more-

https://newrepublic.com/article/162878/barrett-roberts-moderate-supreme-court-term

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, It's Still a Conservative Supreme Court (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2021 OP
Thank You Ralph Nader and Jill Stein! Thunderbeast Jul 2021 #1
Is your strategy to obsess on the elections of 5 years, and 20 years ago? lagomorph777 Jul 2021 #4
To face the consequences of past actions Thunderbeast Jul 2021 #5
barrett will be sabbat hunter Jul 2021 #2
I can't see her "drifting" in but one direction. Harker Jul 2021 #6
The court would have a 5.-4 majority if Hillary had not be sabotage in 2016 LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2021 #3
Thank You Ralph Nader and Jill Stein! Thunderbeast Jul 2021 #7

Thunderbeast

(3,400 posts)
1. Thank You Ralph Nader and Jill Stein!
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 01:04 PM
Jul 2021

Visualize a 7-2 Liberal Court.

Political "purists" f#@ked us for a generation.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. Is your strategy to obsess on the elections of 5 years, and 20 years ago?
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 01:40 PM
Jul 2021

How will we solve problems of the present and future, by living in the past? It's a surefire way to ruin our mental health, and accomplishes exactly zero.

Thunderbeast

(3,400 posts)
5. To face the consequences of past actions
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 03:52 PM
Jul 2021

is how we avoid making the same mistake again and again!

I am not hand-wringing. I am challenging progressive purists to understand the real world and exercise their political power in more than a symbolic way. To change things, we must WIN elections. Gore and Clinton were not my choice in the primary. They were, however, far more likely to move the country toward my ideal than their opponents.

How did your "mental health" fare under the past two Republican presidents?

Thunderbeast

(3,400 posts)
7. Thank You Ralph Nader and Jill Stein!
Thu Jul 1, 2021, 10:51 PM
Jul 2021

Visualize a 7-2 Liberal Court.

Political "purists" f#@ked us for a generation.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Yes, It's Still a Conserv...