No, Facebook and Google Are Not Public Utilities
SHOULD GOOGLE GET treated like your local telephone company? The idea that dominant, front-facing internet platforms should be regulated as common carriers or public utilities has been kicking around for a while. But it got a fresh jolt in April, when Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas issued an opinion suggesting that common-carriage law could allow Congress to regulate social media providers. Ohio attorney general Dave Yost filed a lawsuit in June asking a state court to rule that Googles provision of internet search is properly classified as a common carrier and/or public utility under Ohio common law. Last weekend, Yost published an op-ed in The New York Times touting the strategy as a way to stop Google from favoring its own business over competitors who rely on it to reach customers. As legal touches go, its a lot lighter than what antitrust law would demand, he wrote.
Unfortunately, its also a bit light on logic.
This guy has made such a mess, said Barbara Cherry, a professor of at the Indiana University Media School who studies common carriage and public utility law. For a lawyer, its particularly sloppy.
The first red flag in the Ohio lawsuit is that it doesnt even try to define what a common carrier or public utility is. The second red flag is that Yost suggests that the two concepts are interchangeable. All hes seeking, he wrote in the Times op-ed, is a simple declaration that, under the law, Google is a public utility, or more generally, a common carrier. In fact, common carriage is not a more general species of public utility.
https://www.wired.com/story/no-facebook-google-not-public-utilities/