Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Where Facts Were No Match for Fear
Where Facts Were No Match for Fear, NYT No PaywallCivic boosters in central Montana hoped for some federal money to promote tourism. A disinformation campaign got in the way.
Ms. Grulkowski set about blowing up that effort with everything she had.
She collected addresses from a list of voters and spent $1,300 sending a packet denouncing the proposed heritage area to 1,498 farmers and ranchers. She told them the designation would forbid landowners to build sheds, drill wells or use fertilizers and pesticides. It would alter water rights, give tourists access to private property, create a new taxation district and prohibit new septic systems and burials on private land, she said.
None of this was true.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1646 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Where Facts Were No Match for Fear (Original Post)
reACTIONary
Oct 2021
OP
dalton99a
(81,065 posts)1. But Facebook said 3,000 illegal votes were cast in her county
But when pressed, Ms. Grulkowski, too, was unable to identify a single instance of a property owners being adversely affected by a heritage area. Its not that there are a lot of specific instances, she said. Theres a lot of very wide open things that could happen.
That somewhat amorphous fear was more the point.
Outside of a poultry coop, as her chickens and ducks squawked, Ms. Grulkowski ticked through the falsehoods she had read online and accepted as truths in the past year: The Covid vaccine is more dangerous than the coronavirus. Global child-trafficking rings control the political system. Black Lives Matter was responsible for the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. The United Nations is plotting to control world population and seize private land. Mr. Trump was the rightful winner of last years election. Even in Cascade County, where Mr. Trump won 59 percent of the vote, Ms. Grulkowski argued that 3,000 illegal votes were cast.
We didnt believe in any of that stuff until last July, Ms. Grulkowski said. Then we stumbled on something on the internet, and we watched it, and it took us two days to get over that. And it had to do with the child trafficking that leads to everything. It just didnt seem right, and that was just over the top. And then we started seeing things that are lining up with that everywhere.
That somewhat amorphous fear was more the point.
Outside of a poultry coop, as her chickens and ducks squawked, Ms. Grulkowski ticked through the falsehoods she had read online and accepted as truths in the past year: The Covid vaccine is more dangerous than the coronavirus. Global child-trafficking rings control the political system. Black Lives Matter was responsible for the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. The United Nations is plotting to control world population and seize private land. Mr. Trump was the rightful winner of last years election. Even in Cascade County, where Mr. Trump won 59 percent of the vote, Ms. Grulkowski argued that 3,000 illegal votes were cast.
We didnt believe in any of that stuff until last July, Ms. Grulkowski said. Then we stumbled on something on the internet, and we watched it, and it took us two days to get over that. And it had to do with the child trafficking that leads to everything. It just didnt seem right, and that was just over the top. And then we started seeing things that are lining up with that everywhere.
reACTIONary
(5,749 posts)2. On "the internet", not....
... on "the Facebook". Obviously "the internet" does not "say" anything, and neither does "the Facebook".
Sorry for being a bit touchy about this, but there has been a lot of illiberal Facebook bashing lately. And even NYT basihng, the source for this article.
dalton99a
(81,065 posts)3. Most online disinformation comes through links on Facebook
And Facebook is the platform she uses for her advocacy campaign
https://www.facebook.com/montanansopposingbscnha/
reACTIONary
(5,749 posts)4. I'd like some sort of source for that assertion...
... If most online disinformation comes through links on Facebook, I'm prepared to believe it, but I wouldn't want unsubstantiated disinformation being spread on DU.
lees1975
(3,718 posts)5. Well, don't worry about me ever spending a dime anywhere in Montana
I love visiting heritage areas, but I'll stay away from Montana now.