'Fantasy is not history' Historian Victoria Smolkin assesses Putin's claim
Full title: Fantasy is not history Historian Victoria Smolkin assesses Putins claim that modern-day Ukraine is a gift from the Bolsheviks
3:27 am, February 24, 2022
Source: Meduza
Excerpt: As a historian, what struck me most about the historical narrative of Vladimir Putins speech was not only what historical facts to borrow his terminology Putin used, but also what he left out. It is worth noting that the very existence of Ukraine, in Putins telling, should be understood against the backdrop of the Russian empire, which the Bolsheviks squandered by making generous gifts (щедрые подарки of Russian territory to aspiring nationalities in general, and Ukrainians in particular. Rather than a sovereign nation-state, contemporary (post-Soviet) Ukraine, in this telling, is the product of Bolshevik nationality policy: Vladimir Ilyich Lenins Ukraine. But it also owes its existence to Russias largesse its willingness to gift its territorial patrimony to the aspiring nations on Russian lands.
When, in 1922, the USSR was established on the territory of the former Russian empire, Ukraine constituted one of Soviet Unions four original national republics. For some time after, more administrative units were established and dissolved, their borders rearranged, their numbers in flux. Eventually, they settled on fifteen. With the USSRs dissolution in 1991, Ukraine (like the other republics) inherited these Soviet borders.
In Putins narrative, the reason for the current crisis is Ukraines persistent ingratitude for and, whats worse, squandering of Russias gift.
Listening to the speech, one might be forgiven for asking, alongside Putin: Why was it necessary to give such generous gifts? Why, indeed. That the Bolsheviks would give away Russian lands on the cheap could only be considered some kind of madness! One might also be forgiven for thinking that the Bolsheviks were in possession of Russian lands and that the lands were theirs to give. In fact, Putins history lesson is conspicuously vague on what happened between February 1917 (when the Russian tsar abdicated and, in effect, dissolved the Russian imperial autocracy), and 1922 (when the Soviet Union was constituted on the empires remains). In the speech, we dont really learn what happened to the Russian empire: one moment its there; the next, the Bolsheviks are giving away Russian lands to Ukrainians.
https://meduza.io/en/feature/2022/02/24/fantasy-is-not-history
( An excellent read. )