How to counter Putin: NATO's former supreme allied commander for Europe weighs in By WESLEY CLARK
How to counter Putin: NATOs former supreme allied commander for Europe weighs in
By WESLEY CLARK
Russia has taken off its mask. For years, President Vladimir Putin and his oligarchs have enjoyed the benefits of Western democracies, their wealth and their lifestyles, all the while trying to undercut and destroy them. Russias major attack on Ukraine underscores Putins deep resentment of the West, his fear of democratic values and his determination to restore Russian control over independent, freedom-loving people in Eastern Europe. Whether his attack succeeded depended first on the Ukrainians and their willingness to fight to protect their freedoms, but second, on the United States strength and global leadership.
Though the situation seems dark after three days of combat, there is much to be done.
The battle for Kyiv is moving toward its second phase, as Russian forces battle through Ukrainian defenders, or fly over them, to attempt to encircle Kyiv and force a new, Russian-supporting leader on the people of Ukraine. By all reports, the Ukrainian Army is fighting hard and inflicting losses on a vastly superior force. However, Russian armor columns with tanks and artillery moved in from the north towards Kyiv. U.S.-supplied Javelin antitank missiles and Stinger antiaircraft missiles have proved effective against the Russians. Major tank battles have been fought. As of late Friday, supplies were running low. . .
The best course of action is to demand Russia halt and establish a safe zone over Kyiv and in the western part of the country. This would have to be declared and enforced by the United States. The UN should back this.
In the interim, to keep Ukraine in the fight, and Russia out of Kyiv, Ukraine needs assistance from the United States. This support includes replenishment of Javelin and Stinger stocks, night vision devices and intelligence and communications support. . .
Since President Truman first provided assistance to Greece in fending off a Communist insurgency in 1947 and 1948, the United States has never failed to assist nations defending themselves against attack. Not every effort was successful in the short term, but over 70 years, the United States established its moral authority and America sought to meet its obligation under the UN Charter to assist the victims of aggression.'>>>
https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-who-putin-really-is-20220225-6gcvrti6uzf4ngttpz33x4i2ay-story.html
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)onecaliberal
(32,852 posts)Ocelot II
(115,683 posts)This package will include further lethal defensive assistance to help Ukraine address the armored, airborne, and other threats it is now facing. It is another clear signal that the United States stands with the people of Ukraine as they defend their sovereign, courageous, and proud nation.
https://www.state.gov/additional-military-assistance-for-ukraine/
onecaliberal
(32,852 posts)PortTack
(32,762 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,001 posts)Agree with all the points... they just need to be done.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)that Russia is head of the Security Council for the month of February? Wasn't clear if that position included some sort of super-veto that they won't have in March, or if any of the 5 current members can veto resolutions.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)lees1975
(3,850 posts)and they're getting the GPS information on troop movements from us, too.