Putin may take Kyiv; holding Ukraine another matter
By Clara Ferreira Marques / Bloomberg Opinion
Kyivs residents have watched shells rain down on the city these past days as they did in 1941, then at the start of a brutal war in which Ukraine endured unthinkable suffering. As images circulate of families huddled in basements and in the citys subway for safety while rocket strikes light up the sky, its hard not to make the comparison. Except, this time, the threat is from the east.
Its an imperfect parallel, but a vivid one for many Ukrainians that clashes starkly with Russian President Vladimir Putins outlandish claims to be denazifying Ukraine. Never mind his narrative glossing over inconvenient details like the Nazi-Soviet pact that 1941 is in fact a reason for invasion, an effort to avoid the errors of appeasement. We will not make this mistake the second time, he said in Thursdays televised speech.
But its also a parallel which the Kremlin, even in its delusional state, would be unwise to dismiss. Blitzkrieg campaigns are appealing in the eye of planners but rarely turn out to be either painless or brief; even for powerful nations with apparent military superiority. Russian forces may well overwhelm the Ukrainian capital, but maintaining that control in the face of a motivated defense force and hostile population, not to mention actually achieving Putins longer term aims of regime change and security, is a different matter altogether.
Its worth noting that Ukraine has already held back Russia more effectively than many thought it would. Its early days, but the Russian attack hasnt been surgical nor have particularly sophisticated tactics been on display. A battle outside Kyiv on Thursday saw Russian airborne troops attack an airport, only for the Ukrainian side to reportedly recapture it.
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-putin-may-take-kyiv-holding-ukraine-another-matter/
Irish_Dem
(47,023 posts)Why didn't Putin use a surgical strike?
Or blitzkrieg ??
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)Now they have to go for dirty war.
Irish_Dem
(47,023 posts)Minimal loss of life, etc.
Not turning out that way.
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)BlueWavePsych
(2,635 posts)Shipwack
(2,162 posts)I think Russia has been using the blitzkrieg strategy
planes/artillery/misses, followed by tanks, followed by troops to mop up.
As for surgical strikes, it is my understanding (though I havent kept up with this topic for several years so I may be out of date) that the Russian military is just not that well trained, and cant do anything particularly fancy like a surgical strike.
Yes, they are large, and are possibly better equipped than they used to be, but they dont spend the rubles for field exercises, joint service training, or even live fire practice.
That being said, I still fear that theyll be able to Ukraine militarily, eventually, though it might cost more than they anticipated.
Quantity has a quality all of its own. - Unknown, though often erroneously attributed to Stalin
This is not going the way Putin planned for a number of possible reasons. He hoped for a quick resolution. Perhaps he thought Ukraine would surrender right out of the gate. And his troops are not adequate to pull of a quick strike.
Yes the odds are not in Ukraine's favor long term.