Are AR-15's weapons of war? Here's what a former Fort Benning commander had to say
A former Fort Benning commander took a stand in the countrys ongoing debate on gun control with a thread of tweets posted Thursday evening.
Let me state unequivocally For all intents and purposes, the AR-15 and rifles like it are weapons of war, retired Army Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton wrote on Twitter.
Link to tweet
The retired major general went on to write the AR-15 was the civilian version of the M16, a close relation to the M4 rifles currently used by the military.
It is a very deadly weapon with the same basic functionality that our troops use to kill the enemy, Eaton wrote.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ar-15-weapons-war-former-110000741.html
dchill
(38,447 posts)...I thank the General for his contribution to the good side.
sop
(10,105 posts)to provide Americans the necessary firepower to overthrow a government they don't like.
lapfog_1
(29,193 posts)is for cosplay at overthrowing the government.
If there is a second civil war, fought by proud boys, oaf creepers, militias, and even some "constitutional sheriffs" versus the FBI, normal law enforcement, and the US Army on the other side...
the idiots will lose badly... and rather suddenly.
There will not be anti tank missiles for them, nor stinger missiles, plus their own tanks and rocket launchers. This will not be Ukraine.
so all the talk about armed insurrection is really about cosplay... and intimidation.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(1,915 posts)Is even more absurd thinking that LE and the military would all be on one side. They wouldn't. They would split and take their weapons and equipment with them. Foreign powers wanting to fuel the chaos would smuggle weapons in. And it's been over a decade since since a fought an enemy armed with rifles, body armor, and improvised explosives, while I had the tanks, ifv's, artillery, and air support on my side, and they weren't pushovers and caused plenty of problems despite lacking the technology and heavy equipment advantage we had.
sop
(10,105 posts)SergeStorms
(19,187 posts)and it would be over with in the blink of an eye.
As soon as word got around (and with these keyboard commandos that would be almost instantaneously) that the first skirmish with the U.S. Army resulted in the complete destruction of any "militia" they encountered, the "revolution" would be finished.
Then they'd all crowd around a big bonfire in the forest, drink copious amounts of beer, and exchange "war stories" about the day they almost overthrew the government of the United States.
Warpy
(111,169 posts)a drone 16,000 feet in the air fully loaded with Hellfire missiles. Not going to happen, guys.
What they're used for is target shooting, posing with on social media, occasionally by ranchers shooting at coyotes and wild dogs harassing their stock, and by men who want to hunt and kill people. Nobody in a civil society needs a semi auto anything, especially a semi auto rifle.
They believe wrong. There's a lot written in the constitution besides one badly written amendment. Maybe they need to read all of it.
GoldandSilver
(186 posts)Its time to start speaking in real terms about real issues.
Im sick of hearing about protecting my family when what they mean is if you dont do things my way, Ill kill you and your little dog too.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,104 posts)weapon of mass destruction. My opinion counts as much as his.
SergeStorms
(19,187 posts)I love your posts and have great respect, but in a court of law or before a Congressional Committee, your opinion does not carry the same weight as that of a military expert.
Almost.....but not quite.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,104 posts)towerbum
(263 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,104 posts)ArmaLite first developed the AR-15 in the late 1950s as a military rifle, but had limited success in selling it. In 1959 the company sold the design to Colt.
In 1963, the U.S. military selected Colt to manufacture the automatic rifle that soon became standard issue for U.S. troops in the Vietnam War. It was known as the M-16.
Armed with that success, Colt ramped up production of a semiautomatic version of the M-16 that it sold to law enforcement and the public, marketed as the AR-15.
towerbum
(263 posts)for jungle war fare - very close quarter contact ! by the time you could get your rifle un-tangled from the vegetation around you , you had about 50 holes in ya ' ! the long rifle was useless in jungle & urban war-fare ! so that's when they came up with the short version -ar-15 ! I played 3 yrs in jungles of V.N. ! first hand knowledge will teach ya' every time ! have a good one sir !
ashredux
(2,599 posts)Rapid fire, little recall, high velocity shells designed for maximum damage upon impact to kill
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,757 posts)This allows the next round to be loaded.
ashredux
(2,599 posts)Rapid fire, little recall, high velocity shells designed for maximum damage upon impact to kill
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Literally the civilian version of US military's M16 and M4 Carbine. Gun humpers love to say no military in the world uses the AR-15. A distinction without much difference when it comes to mass shooting civilians.
The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles and military models is select fire. Military rifles were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires three rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[18][19] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (370 mm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.[20]
In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[21] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[22] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[23]
world wide wally
(21,739 posts)Or a fighter jet or bomber for that matter?
towerbum
(263 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,568 posts)You never know when the Avengers are going to turn their powers from good to evil. I've kept my map from the Hollywood homes tour so I've got the coordinates of every radical liberal elite's house in Hollywood, Beverly Hills and Malibu.
towerbum
(263 posts)pstokely
(10,523 posts)ginny skinny
(182 posts)I was reading at this site that it was a good thing that Ukrainians were armed.
I have a few ARs, when the trumpies come to take me to the re-education ditches, I hope to go down shooting.