Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Jonathan Turley Sums Up January 6 Hearings Like He Didn't Watch January 6 Hearings
Could he really be this bad at legal analysis?
Theres an episode of Futurama where Professor Farnsworth explains that he made up The Mathematics of Quantum Neutrino Fields because no student would ever take it, allowing him to remain employed at Mars University without ever actually teaching. This is relevant because Jonathan Turley might have found a role model.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turleys descent into casual racism, mischaracterizing the law, and just making up historical events for no reason in order to keep relevant to the people who book right-wing cable news smacks of self-destructive narcissism. Theres a genuine sadness in watching someone squander an academic reputation just to stretch out 15 minutes of fame.
But maybe weve got it all wrong! Maybe Turley is crazy like a fox. Because if you wanted to collect checks from a law school but never teach a real class again, you could do a lot worse than spend all your time on TV whiffing this badly on legal analysis.
By leaning into the talking point that this is all just mean talk about Trump, Turleys relying on what can at best be characterized as legalish thinking. Generally casting aspersions on the election process isnt a crime! Conspiring with fake slates of electors and trying to convince the Vice President to hijack the Constitution would be. Criminal liability for incitement is, correctly, a wildly high hill to climb! Using public office to obstruct a response that put lives at risk makes for a different story. Campaigns can use all sorts of puffery without being illegal! Making up funds to raise money for lawsuits while always intending to funnel the money to yourself and your cronies well, you get the idea.
Theres an episode of Futurama where Professor Farnsworth explains that he made up The Mathematics of Quantum Neutrino Fields because no student would ever take it, allowing him to remain employed at Mars University without ever actually teaching. This is relevant because Jonathan Turley might have found a role model.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turleys descent into casual racism, mischaracterizing the law, and just making up historical events for no reason in order to keep relevant to the people who book right-wing cable news smacks of self-destructive narcissism. Theres a genuine sadness in watching someone squander an academic reputation just to stretch out 15 minutes of fame.
But maybe weve got it all wrong! Maybe Turley is crazy like a fox. Because if you wanted to collect checks from a law school but never teach a real class again, you could do a lot worse than spend all your time on TV whiffing this badly on legal analysis.
By leaning into the talking point that this is all just mean talk about Trump, Turleys relying on what can at best be characterized as legalish thinking. Generally casting aspersions on the election process isnt a crime! Conspiring with fake slates of electors and trying to convince the Vice President to hijack the Constitution would be. Criminal liability for incitement is, correctly, a wildly high hill to climb! Using public office to obstruct a response that put lives at risk makes for a different story. Campaigns can use all sorts of puffery without being illegal! Making up funds to raise money for lawsuits while always intending to funnel the money to yourself and your cronies well, you get the idea.
https://abovethelaw.com/2022/06/jonathan-turley-sums-up-january-6-hearings-like-he-didnt-watch-january-6-hearings/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2045 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jonathan Turley Sums Up January 6 Hearings Like He Didn't Watch January 6 Hearings (Original Post)
IcyPeas
Jun 2022
OP
Karadeniz
(22,468 posts)1. I remember liking him years ago and watching him descend into weird...
hlthe2b
(102,119 posts)2. I'll just agree with the preeminent Laurence Tribe on this and Turley:
Deuxcents
(16,081 posts)3. What happened to him?
He used to be sought after for his opinions but..
Marcuse
(7,446 posts)4. He argued for the impeachment of Clinton for lying - which is tfg's first language.