Same-Sex Marriage and Contraception Should Be Next on Chopping Block: Clarence Thomas
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/same-sex-marriage-contraception-roe-v-wade-decision-1373759/Same-Sex Marriage and Contraception Should Be Next on Chopping Block: Clarence Thomas
The Supreme Court has officially struck down Roe v. Wade, and the courts conservatives may not be done restricting the rights of Americans
By Nikki McCann Ramirez
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court stripped American women of their right to reproductive autonomy. In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday determined that states can restrict or outright ban abortion at any point during a pregnancy. The decision overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 case that established a constitutional right to abortion services.
In a concurring opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that the Supreme Court should reconsider previous rulings that established the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and protections for same-sex relationships.
We should reconsider all of this Courts substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergfell, Thomas wrote.
The three cases are fundamental rulings that established key reproductive, sexual, and civic rights for Americans. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) established the right of married couples to purchase contraception without government restriction. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) established that criminal punishments for those who commit sodomy were unconstitutional. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) ruled that the right to marriage was guaranteed to same-sex couples. The targeting of these decisions by Thomas indicates claims by conservatives that the interpretation of the due process clause and right to privacy used to overturn Roe v. Wade will be limited to rulings on abortion access are not to be believed.
CincyDem
(6,350 posts)Beachnutt
(7,311 posts)Clarence.
RKP5637
(67,103 posts)wnylib
(21,425 posts)interracial marriage.
RKP5637
(67,103 posts)Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)What horrible things would she had done.
When women can't get birth control will that be enough.
This is not the 1700's.
RKP5637
(67,103 posts)wryter2000
(46,032 posts)So predictable
wnylib
(21,425 posts)forbid abortion. I am not Catholic, so why should I be governed by canon law?
Right wingers love to scare people about the dangers of Sharia law, but we Americans have much more to fear from Canon law. And from the fundamentalist Evangicals who side with the Catholic Church.
Freedom of religion is being violated by the SC.
Crowman2009
(2,494 posts)I anticipate people finally getting fed up with their pro-life church and will just leave.
Behind the Aegis
(53,944 posts)How can this be?! Sure, it hasn't happened yet....but Roe V. Wade also wasn't going to be overturned either.
The rights of all minorities are under assault and it is time for people to realize this, come together, stop with petty bickering and KEEP the Congress and TAKE BACK the states!
These foul, shitstains will NEVER stop with one group, they will always go after another and another. Nazi Germany didn't start with the Jews, but they sure as fuck didn't stop with us either!