Requiem for the Supreme Court by Linda Greenhouse
They did it because they could.
It was as simple as that.
With the stroke of a pen, Justice Samuel Alito and four other justices, all chosen by Republican presidents running on successive party platforms committed to overturning Roe v. Wade, erased the constitutional right to reproductive autonomy that the Supreme Court recognized more than 49 years ago. As the dissenting opinion written by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan observed, never before had the court rescinded an individual right and left it up to the states whether to respect what had once been anchored in the Constitution.
The practical consequences of the decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, are enormous and severe. Abortion, now one of the most common medical procedures, will be banned or sharply limited in about half the country. Excluding miscarriages, nearly one in five pregnancies ends in abortion in the United States, and one American woman in four will terminate a pregnancy during her lifetime. Two generations of women in this country have come of age secure in the knowledge that an unintended pregnancy need not knock their lives off course. After today, as the dissent pointed out, young women will come of age with fewer rights than their mothers and grandmothers had.
What the court delivered on Friday is a requiem for the right to abortion. As Chief Justice John Roberts, who declined to join Justice Alitos opinion, may well suspect, it is also a requiem for the Supreme Court.'>>>
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/24/opinion/roe-v-wade-dobbs-decision.html