Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Once a Crucial Refuge, 'Gayborhoods' Lose L.G.B.T.Q. Residents in Major Cities
Once a Crucial Refuge, Gayborhoods Lose L.G.B.T.Q. Residents in Major Cities
Many are choosing to live elsewhere in search of cheaper housing and better amenities. They are finding growing acceptance in other communities after decades of political and social changes.
By Adam Nagourney
Published July 3, 2022
Updated July 4, 2022
SAN FRANCISCO Cleve Jones has lived in the Castro neighborhood for nearly 50 years, almost from the day he graduated from high school in Phoenix and hitchhiked to California. ... He has been a political and cultural leader in San Francisco, organizing gay men and lesbians when the AIDS epidemic devastated these streets in the early 1980s. He created the nationally recognized AIDS Memorial Quilt from a storefront on Market Street. He was a face of the anger and sorrow that swept the Castro in 1978 after the assassination of Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man elected to the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Jones has helped define the Castro, dancing at its gay bars seven nights a week when he was younger, gathering with friends for drinks and gossip as he grew older. To this day, he is recognized when he walks down its sidewalks. Hi Cleve I know who you are, said Lt. Amy Hurwitz of the San Francisco Police Department, after Mr. Jones began to introduce himself.
But in May, Mr. Jones, 67, left for a small home with a garden and apple and peach trees 75 miles away in Sonoma County after the monthly cost of his one-bedroom apartment soared from $2,400 to $5,200.
His story is not just another tale of a longtime resident priced out of a gentrifying housing market. Across the country, L.G.B.T.Q. neighborhoods in big cities New York, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco among them are experiencing a confluence of social, cultural and economic factors, accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, that is diluting their influence and visibility. In a few cases, some L.G.B.T.Q. leaders say, the neighborhoods very existence is threatened.
{snip}
Many are choosing to live elsewhere in search of cheaper housing and better amenities. They are finding growing acceptance in other communities after decades of political and social changes.
By Adam Nagourney
Published July 3, 2022
Updated July 4, 2022
SAN FRANCISCO Cleve Jones has lived in the Castro neighborhood for nearly 50 years, almost from the day he graduated from high school in Phoenix and hitchhiked to California. ... He has been a political and cultural leader in San Francisco, organizing gay men and lesbians when the AIDS epidemic devastated these streets in the early 1980s. He created the nationally recognized AIDS Memorial Quilt from a storefront on Market Street. He was a face of the anger and sorrow that swept the Castro in 1978 after the assassination of Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man elected to the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Jones has helped define the Castro, dancing at its gay bars seven nights a week when he was younger, gathering with friends for drinks and gossip as he grew older. To this day, he is recognized when he walks down its sidewalks. Hi Cleve I know who you are, said Lt. Amy Hurwitz of the San Francisco Police Department, after Mr. Jones began to introduce himself.
But in May, Mr. Jones, 67, left for a small home with a garden and apple and peach trees 75 miles away in Sonoma County after the monthly cost of his one-bedroom apartment soared from $2,400 to $5,200.
His story is not just another tale of a longtime resident priced out of a gentrifying housing market. Across the country, L.G.B.T.Q. neighborhoods in big cities New York, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco among them are experiencing a confluence of social, cultural and economic factors, accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, that is diluting their influence and visibility. In a few cases, some L.G.B.T.Q. leaders say, the neighborhoods very existence is threatened.
{snip}
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1340 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Once a Crucial Refuge, 'Gayborhoods' Lose L.G.B.T.Q. Residents in Major Cities (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2022
OP
This is criminal. Rent... $2,400 to $5,200. Greed capitalism at its worst.
CurtEastPoint
Jul 2022
#1
CurtEastPoint
(18,663 posts)1. This is criminal. Rent... $2,400 to $5,200. Greed capitalism at its worst.
jimfields33
(15,958 posts)3. I don't understand how our bluest cities allow this
Capitalism can be blamed but the city can do lots to curtail it.
OldBaldy1701E
(5,157 posts)4. Why? They are raking it in, why should they stop? (n/t)
whathehell
(29,091 posts)5. ..To show some fidelity to their democratic roots?
...just a thought.
OldBaldy1701E
(5,157 posts)8. Oh, I agree with you.
But, the almighty dollar runs the show. It goes beyond right or left. Hell, millionaires and up seem to be the only thing both sides have in common.
whathehell
(29,091 posts)10. Maybe they, meaning "our side", the dems, should be called
out on it more.. The other side too. of course, it's just that they seem incorrigible.
MichMan
(11,972 posts)6. When a homeowner sells for a big profit after doing nothing but living there for years
Last edited Sat Jul 9, 2022, 10:42 AM - Edit history (1)
we call it a good investment, instead of gouging the buyer.
whathehell
(29,091 posts)9. By law, a home is private property...Our government is not
private property, at least it's not supposed to be.
MichMan
(11,972 posts)11. So we're the rentals referenced in the OP owned privately.
The government doesn't own them
Crazyleftie
(458 posts)2. not in Chicago....
msongs
(67,441 posts)7. subscription required nt