Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(137,380 posts)
Fri Aug 12, 2022, 08:16 PM Aug 2022

The Fifth Amendment tables could turn on Trump

This week, in addition to having his private residence searched by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, former President Donald Trump was deposed in an investigation by the New York Attorney General’s office. There he apparently didn’t say much other than that he was asserting his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. And here is what you should know.

The jury could be allowed to consider whether Trump asserted his right against self-incrimination because he has something to hide.

The Fifth Amendment allows you, me and Trump to refuse to answer questions if there is a genuine risk that we could face criminal prosecution based on what we say. But, and this is a big one, the Fifth Amendment does not protect us from a jury in a federal civil case judging us for staying silent and invoking our Fifth Amendment rights.

The jury could be allowed to consider whether Trump asserted his right against self-incrimination because he has something to hide. Specifically, the jury could consider why Trump thinks he might face criminal prosecution for answering specific questions about his businesses’ practices and whether he signed off on fraudulent financial documents.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-fifth-amendment-tables-could-turn-on-trump/ar-AA10x3bd

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Fifth Amendment tables could turn on Trump (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2022 OP
Answering your questions would incriminate me . . . Aussie105 Aug 2022 #1
IIRC, the deposition lasted 6 hours. 3catwoman3 Aug 2022 #2
How does that compare to murielm99 Aug 2022 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Stardust Mirror Aug 2022 #4
different math? Stardust Mirror Aug 2022 #5
Oops - your math is right. 3catwoman3 Aug 2022 #6
When the truth won't set you free: Marcuse Aug 2022 #7

Aussie105

(8,168 posts)
1. Answering your questions would incriminate me . . .
Fri Aug 12, 2022, 08:24 PM
Aug 2022

So I will just stick to the fifth.

Said no innocent person with nothing to hide, ever.

Inference is pretty clear.


3catwoman3

(29,784 posts)
2. IIRC, the deposition lasted 6 hours.
Fri Aug 12, 2022, 08:56 PM
Aug 2022

Last edited Sat Aug 13, 2022, 11:02 AM - Edit history (2)

Taking the 5th 440 times in 6 hours is 73.33 per minute.

Oops - as noted below by Stardust Mirror, my math is off. Should be 73.33 per hour.

murielm99

(33,083 posts)
3. How does that compare to
Sat Aug 13, 2022, 01:34 AM
Aug 2022

the number of lies he told during the four years of his presidency? Does anyone have a number?

Did he lie 30,000 times? Or was it more?

Response to 3catwoman3 (Reply #2)

Stardust Mirror

(685 posts)
5. different math?
Sat Aug 13, 2022, 10:50 AM
Aug 2022

6 hours x 60 minutes/hour = 360 minutes
360 minutes divided by 440 = 0.818/minute

0.818 is quite different that 73.33

Is my math wrong?

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Fifth Amendment table...