Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Opinion Trump's risk of indictment for his document snatch just skyrocketed
Opinion Trumps risk of indictment for his document snatch just skyrocketedWhen U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart initially indicated he was disposed to unsealing the affidavit accompanying the search warrant executed at former president Donald Trumps Mar-a-Lago home, former prosecutors and legal experts were surprised, to put it mildly.
Sign up for a weekly roundup of thought-provoking ideas and debates
Now it appears we are unlikely to see much if anything from the affidavit and for good reason. On Monday, Reinhart issued a ruling noting that one of the statutes for which I found probable cause prohibits obstructing an investigation. Also, as some of the media Intervenors have reported, there have been increased threats against FBI personnel since the search.
He therefore found that given the public notoriety and controversy about this search, it is likely that even witnesses who are not expressly named in the Affidavit would be quickly and broadly identified over social media and other communication channels, which could lead to them being harassed and intimidated. In other words, the MAGA campaign of incitement against law enforcement should weigh heavily against disclosure.
Reinhart continued, The Affidavit discloses the sources and methods used by the Government in its ongoing investigation. I agree with the Government that the Affidavit contains, among other critically important and detailed investigative facts: highly sensitive information about witnesses, including witnesses interviewed by the government; specific investigative techniques; and information required by law to be kept under seal.
Reinhart therefore concluded: Government has a compelling reason not to publicize that information at this time. Reinhart agreed to consider whether a redacted affidavit might be released, but his opinion strongly suggests that nothing significant would be revealed.
More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/23/trump-documents-indictment-risk-skyrocket/
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinion Trump's risk of indictment for his document snatch just skyrocketed (Original Post)
Novara
Aug 2022
OP
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)1. Shouldn't Trump be in jail for inciting the uptick in Threats and
the two men who tried it.
He is A Political Charles Manson
Novara
(6,115 posts)3. It's called stochastic terrorism
stochastic terrorism
[ stuh-kas-tik ter-uh-riz-uhm ]SHOW IPA
noun
the public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of a violent act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted:
The lone-wolf attack was apparently influenced by the rhetoric of stochastic terrorism.
And he's an expert.
dalton99a
(94,950 posts)2. Pdf of order:
Skittles
(172,411 posts)4. this same guy shouted LOCK HER UP
wrap your head around THAT