Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 10:37 PM Dec 2011

The Pentagon and its Sock Puppets by Scott Horton

December 27, 2011

An internal Department of Defense review has concluded that a Rumsfeld-era program under which retired military officers who appeared on American broadcast media were given special briefings and access was consistent with Pentagon rules. The New York Times reports:

The inquiry found that from 2002 to 2008, Mr. Rumsfeld’s Pentagon organized 147 events for 74 military analysts. These included 22 meetings at the Pentagon, 114 conference calls with generals and senior Pentagon officials and 11 Pentagon-sponsored trips to Iraq and Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Twenty of the events, according to a 35-page report of the inquiry’s findings, involved Mr. Rumsfeld or the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or both. One retired officer, the report said, recalled Mr. Rumsfeld telling him: “You guys influence a wide range of people. We’d like to be sure you have the facts.”

The inspector general’s investigation grappled with the question of whether the outreach constituted an earnest effort to inform the public or an improper campaign of news media manipulation. The inquiry confirmed that Mr. Rumsfeld’s staff frequently provided military analysts with talking points before their network appearances. In some cases, the report said, military analysts “requested talking points on specific topics or issues.” One military analyst described the talking points as “bullet points given for a political purpose.” Another military analyst, the report said, told investigators that the outreach program’s intent “was to move everyone’s mouth on TV as a sock puppet.”

The internal review also apparently found no fault with the exclusion of four individuals precisely because they refused to be sock puppets, speaking critically of some Pentagon decisions. One of them, General Wesley Clark, apparently lost his position as an analyst for CNN because of Pentagon and White House displeasure with what he had to say.

in full: http://www.harpers.org/archive/2011/12/hbc-90008374

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Pentagon and its Sock Puppets by Scott Horton (Original Post) Jefferson23 Dec 2011 OP
Propaganda R Us. ChairmanAgnostic Dec 2011 #1
...the right facts...OUR facts Remember Me Dec 2011 #2
Why should taxpayers pay the Sec. Defense or any other government employee JDPriestly Dec 2011 #3
By this logic Roy Rolling Dec 2011 #4
So, today, Uncle Don says this story has been "debunked" by the Pentagon IG EFerrari Dec 2011 #5
LOL, thanks for posting that. No rules broken, and no morals either...what a time it has been. n/t Jefferson23 Dec 2011 #6
It's touching that he's so concerned about his socks. EFerrari Dec 2011 #7
Ironically, it is against the DU TOS to accuse others of being a sockpuppet. Boston_Chemist Dec 2011 #8
i too have investigated myself arely staircase Dec 2011 #9

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
3. Why should taxpayers pay the Sec. Defense or any other government employee
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 02:52 AM
Dec 2011

to give special briefings to retired military leaders so that those retired "leaders" can make money as consultants on TV spewing government propaganda?

That is a huge waste of the taxpayers' money.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
5. So, today, Uncle Don says this story has been "debunked" by the Pentagon IG
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 01:18 PM
Dec 2011

because his report says, no rules were broken.

LOL

@RumsfeldOffice Donald Rumsfeld
The Pentagon Inspector General debunked the NYTimes Pulitzer-winning story. Will the prize now be withdrawn? online.wsj.com/article/SB1000…
19 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone

https://twitter.com/#!/RumsfeldOffice/status/152070960764305409

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Pentagon and its Sock...