Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,273 posts)
Thu Nov 17, 2022, 09:08 PM Nov 2022

Congress must seat the Cherokee delegate

Nearly two centuries ago, the Cherokee Nation bargained for a treaty right to send a non-voting delegate to the United States Congress. Today, it remains unfulfilled. This week, the House Rules Committee held a hearing on seating the Cherokee Nation’s delegate in the U.S. House — an essential next step in fulfilling the treaty mandate.

In 1835, the Cherokees negotiated what became the Treaty of New Echota, which would inevitably lead to “removal” from their homeland in the southeast part of the U.S. to what is now Oklahoma. The treaty triggered the darkest period in Cherokee history during the Trail of Tears, when the Cherokee people were forcibly marched thousands of miles. A quarter of the Cherokee Nation perished.

Despite the devastation wrought by the treaty, it did, however, provide one critically important promise from the U.S. government. Cherokee negotiators insisted that they have a delegate seat in Congress. And so, in crystal clear terms, the United States “stipulated” that the Cherokee Nation “shall be entitled to a delegate in the House of Representatives … whenever Congress shall make provision for the same.”

What is striking about this provision is its use of classic mandatory language that creates a right for the Cherokee Nation and imposes a duty on the United States: The Nation is “entitled to a delegate” and the U.S. “stipulated” that it “shall” comply with this duty. The sole limit on this right and duty — that the Cherokee will receive its delegate “whenever Congress shall make provision for the same” — concerns only implementation timing. It does not allow Congress to decide whether to fulfill this obligation.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/congress-must-seat-the-cherokee-delegate/ar-AA14erTm

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress must seat the Cherokee delegate (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2022 OP
I hope this works out. GreenWave Nov 2022 #1
Most Cherokee are Republican, btw Effete Snob Nov 2022 #2
Party affiliation wasn't part of the deal BWdem4life Nov 2022 #3
Are the Cherokee unique in this situation? GreenWave Nov 2022 #4
I'm sure they are not. nt BWdem4life Nov 2022 #5
 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
2. Most Cherokee are Republican, btw
Thu Nov 17, 2022, 09:31 PM
Nov 2022

There are two Cherokee members of Congress.

They are both Republican:

Markwayne Mullin and Yvette Herrell.

They are Cherokee, VOTING members of Congress and vote against us every chance they get.

So, sure, let’s throw in another Republican from Oklahoma. Great plan.

BWdem4life

(1,701 posts)
3. Party affiliation wasn't part of the deal
Thu Nov 17, 2022, 11:02 PM
Nov 2022

And I love that they haven't given up on getting their treaty promises fulfilled. I think this goes way beyond party. Also, if I read it right, it's a non-voting delegate.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Congress must seat the Ch...