Noonan: The Half-Madness of Prince Harry
Prince Harrys book is odd. Theres even something half-mad about it.
He opens with a dramatic meeting at Frogmore, his former mansion on the grounds of Windsor. It is just after the death of Prince Philip, Harrys paternal grandfather. For months Harry has been estranged from his father, Charles, and his brother, Williama full-scale public rupture. Harry has flown in from America and requested a meeting. The day is overcast, chilly. Charles and William arrive late looking grim, almost menacing, and tightly aligned. Theyd come ready for a fight. Harry is tongue-tied, vulnerable, leaves heartbroken. I wanted peace. I wanted it more than anything.
You feel such sympathy. What could have driven them so far apart? Why are Charles and William so cold? Then you realize, waitPhilip died just a month after the Oprah interview in which Harry rather coolly portrayed his family as remote and hapless puppets and implied they were racist. Harry forgets, in the opening, to tell us that part. But you can see how it might have left Charles and William a little indignant.
This is the books great flaw, that Harry doesnt always play it straight, that he thinks my truth is as good as the truth. There are other flaws, and they grate. Theres a heightened-ness to his languagehe never leaves a place; he flees it in fear for our sanity and physical safety. He often finds his wife sobbing uncontrollably on the floor and the stairs, mostly over what he fails to realize are trivial things. He is grandiose: My mother was a princess, named after a goddess. How would I be remembered by history? For the headlines? Or for who I actually was? Lord, he was an attractive man fifth in line for a largely ceremonial European throne; it would hardly remember him at all. (Unless he wrote a scalding book and destabilized the monarchy!) He repeatedly points out that hes a Windsor and of royal blood. His title means a lot to him. He is exhibitionistic: My penis was oscillating between extremely sensitive and borderline traumatized. (Frostbite.)
(snip)
Harrys anecdotes tend to undermine the institution of the monarchy. When he was a teenager Britains biggest tabloid told the palace it had evidence he was doing drugs. In fact, as Harry tells us candidly, he did do drugs when he was young. The palace, no doubt knowing this, opted to play ball with the newspaper and not deny all aspects of the story. This made Harry feel thrown under the bus.
(snip)
Harry accuses the tabloids of violating his privacy, and no doubt they often did. What is almost unbelievable is that he is so unmoored and destabilized by this inevitable aspect of fame, especially royal fame. He implies he left Britain primarily because of the newspapers and their criticism of his wife. But the odd, half-mad thing about this book is that in it he violates his own privacy, and that of others, more than Fleet Street ever could.
More..
https://archive.ph/7pLI6#selection-423.0-427.142
==============
A different review commented that the supposedly offensive remarks of the skin color of the future son is never mentioned in the book.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Up is down.
Blah, blah, blah.
Hate her.
live love laugh
(13,141 posts)LakeArenal
(28,847 posts)lapfog_1
(29,227 posts)she is an idiot asshole, always has been, always will be.
phoenix75
(290 posts)and we are not subjects of the British crown on this side of the pond. So why all the media fascination with Harry?
(asking for a friend)
question everything
(47,538 posts)and, recently, some mentioned all the "great" reviews of the book.
This is why I posted this and it is unfortunate that many just "kill the messenger" instead of actually reading the post.
And last week "60 minutes" that honorable program dedicated the whole hour to interview and also on CNN.
And as other reviews noted: he complained about tabloids going after him and his family while... going just the same.
phoenix75
(290 posts)I am simply trying to understand why Americans are so enthralled about British royalty.
Peace Love and Joy 🙏
question everything
(47,538 posts)Bill Maher recently commented that the are our royalty.
Or even fascination with other celebrities in sport and in the entertainment industries.
What talents did GA Senatorial candidate Walker have, besides being a football star?
The sad reality is that we love to fawn over celebrities. I think something similar was with Princess Diana.
PortTack
(32,797 posts)#2 was harry and meghan!
Sky Jewels
(7,147 posts)When will she just go away?
question everything
(47,538 posts)niyad
(113,587 posts)dem4decades
(11,304 posts)Now climb back into the hole you climbed out of.
Redleg
(5,845 posts)Seems to me that a person of Noonan's status should know this distinction.
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)Anyway, Harry is entitled to share his side of the story. I've watched the interviews and Netflix series.
Harry is entitled to share that the "unnamed source" from Buckingham palace were his family planting stories and lies to the tabloids! I would be furious too because that's what abusers do. They lie about you so that you look bad. The unnamed sources are Camila, William and the freaking King and their staff.
He's fighting the battle for his future. He's trying to stop the madness with the palace and the press. If you are against Harry and Meghan, then you've been brainwashed by the tabloids and are not "hearing" what he's saying. If you're against Harry and Meghan, you have proved his point.
Skittles
(153,202 posts)as someone who grew up in England I BEG to differ
over and OUT
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)Really? I am married to a Brit who does not gaf about the monarchy but your response is interesting. If you disagree you should explain the Lolol. Or just ignore me.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)2) I'd be curious - if you took a survey, a) how many Americans could correctly identify the reigning British monarch b) how many Americans could name the current British PM, and c) how many Americans understand which one actually oversees the British government.
3) I didn't realize Peggy could write anything without lapsing into memories of what a wonderful guy Dutch was......
question everything
(47,538 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Point taken - my criticism of Noonan may have been unfair.
Paladin
(28,276 posts)Not this time. I'll stick with my intentions of avoiding Harry's book. And the inevitable movie. Way too many problems here at home to deal with. And life's too short.
question everything
(47,538 posts)Skittles
(153,202 posts)I'm glad my English mum did not live to see those two whining on American TV during a pandemic, it would have broken her heart
maspaha
(225 posts)If Harry is half crazy, then Peg is completely coo-coo for cocoa puffs! If Harrys only telling half the truth, ya know, like his side of his story, then Pegs a known liar for amplify the GOP lies that led the US into a 20+ year war in the Middle East.
Peggy, shut up! Nobody dies reading Harrys book!
Skittles
(153,202 posts)they hate invasion of privacy but plaster themselves everywhere for money
disgusting
Response to question everything (Original post)
Post removed