The Freedom Caucus Was Designed To Disrupt
At the beginning of this month, the House endured the longest contest to elect a speaker in 164 years. Rep. Kevin McCarthy ultimately was elected speaker, but only after he made several concessions to a small but influential faction of dissenting conservative Republicans. Though not every member of the Freedom Caucus a far-right coalition of Republican lawmakers voted against McCarthy, nearly every member who did oppose him was a member of the Freedom Caucus.1
That commonality has drawn renewed attention to the Freedom Caucus and its role within Congress. Despite being a minority in the House, the Freedom Caucus has repeatedly punched above its weight and effected genuine change in the chamber. Powerful political factions are as old as American politics, and in most ways, the Freedom Caucus is just a continuation of that tradition. But in a few keyways, its members are doing something different: voting as a bloc, willing to go against their own partys leadership and to gum up the works to make a statement. Those differences have allowed the Freedom Caucus to exercise influence over the better part of the past decade and are why its only just getting started.
Modern congressional caucuses emerged in the last century, though less formal organizations of like-minded members have existed in Congress since the start, according to Ruth Bloch Rubin, a political science professor at the University of Chicago and the author of Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress. During the Progressive Era in the early 20th century, a group of insurgent Republicans worked alongside Democrats to strip away some of the powers that had been consolidated by the speaker. In the 1960s and 70s, the left-leaning Democratic Study Group worked to push through civil rights legislation (along with, later, the Congressional Black Caucus), against bitter opposition from conservative Southern Democrats.
Typically, such influential intraparty factions emerge only when parties find themselves especially divided, Bloch Rubin said. Its usually because theres enough of a cleavage within the party that these sorts of factions have enough members and the distance between one faction and a competitor faction within the same party is enough that it warrants this kind of organizational work, she said.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-freedom-caucus-was-designed-to-disrupt/