Clarence Thomas's luxury travel: A threat to the court's legitimacy?
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomass friendship with a billionaire real estate developer has come under intense scrutiny following a report last week by ProPublica that details luxury vacations Thomas took part in over the past two decades.
According to the report, Thomas and his wife, Ginni, have enjoyed lavish trips funded by Texas billionaire Harlan Crow virtually every year, including global travel on Crows superyacht and private jet as well as annual visits to his properties in the U.S. The justice did not report any of these trips in his annual financial disclosures.
Thomas, a staunch conservative who has played a critical role in the Supreme Courts rightward tilt in his more than 30 years on the bench, released a statement asserting that the trips did not need to be disclosed because they fell under an exception that allows for personal hospitality from close personal friends. Legal experts disagree over whether Thomass failure to report his travels with Crow violated federal disclosure laws, with some arguing that until recently the rules were too ambiguous to clearly assert that he should have disclosed them.
The Supreme Court is generally left to police itself. Unlike officials on lower federal courts, the nine justices are not bound by a formal code of ethics. Because the countrys founders wanted members of the nations top court to be shielded from politics, the other branches of government have little power to influence the court other than the drastic step of impeachment.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/clarence-thomass-luxury-travel-a-threat-to-the-courts-legitimacy-151954357.html