How many scandals will it take for DOJ to investigate Clarence Thomas?
Opinion by Svante Myrick, opinion contributor
Lets get this straight: If a state legislator accepts so much as a sandwich, they must disclose it. I know; I served in local government for 14 years.
So its been very difficult to understand how Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has gotten away with accepting free trips on superyachts and private jets belonging to a billionaire, Harlan Crow, not to mention a sweetheart real estate deal with that same billionaire, without disclosing them. For years.
Nevertheless, that is apparently what happened. And now that its all come to light, the party should be over for Thomas. I say should because while there is a lot of talk about accountability, its been less clear how that will come to pass. Thomas has resisted calls to resign. Impeachment seems highly unlikely given the Republican leadership of the House. Senate hearings may happen, and thats a positive step.
Fortunately, there are also other options, including one very good one with solid legal underpinnings: a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation under federal statutes that require disclosure of the kind of perks Thomas has enjoyed, and also authorize penalties for violators.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/how-many-scandals-will-it-take-for-doj-to-investigate-clarence-thomas/ar-AA1ah8Yk
Walleye
(31,081 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,525 posts)We have a corrupt government.
Half of US high level elected and appointment officials are criminals.
Greatest moral collapse in US history.
Duh, I wish people could keep up and face reality.
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,836 posts)When youre right, youre right, and youre right
- Jake Gittes, Chinatown.
Takes more than high words and lofty ideals to defend democracy from the likes of Shithole Clarence.
republianmushroom
(13,749 posts)27 months and counting
mopinko
(70,269 posts)is for all of us to demand he resign. there is no process in place now that will remove him.
i mean, there is, but were too broken to use it.
dutch777
(3,050 posts)NullTuples
(6,017 posts)...and let's face it, even now they're running out of time and running up against the, "it would be unbecoming of us to indict a presidential candidate" excuse.
Beastly Boy
(9,505 posts)A scandal does not necessarily constitute reasonable cause to believe a crime has been committed.
There is a House Judiciary Committee and a Senate Judiciary Committee that are far better suited to investigate scandals, because they don't have to convince a judge of reasonable cause. Then, if they feel like it, they can make referrals to DOJ., refer their findings to DOJ.
Some may find it hard to believe, but DOJ is not always at fault for every big or little thing that upsets people at any given moment.
live love laugh
(13,162 posts)*But this fact wont stop the DOJ pile-on contingent.
lees1975
(3,891 posts)He will get away with it, just like he got away with sexually harassing Anita Hill. Nothing will be done. No one will get up off their ass and do anything more than mutter about it.