A Black student was suspended for his hairstyle. The school says it wasn't discrimination
I am surprised to see that Texas passed this law.
It Just Never Ends!!!
Texas High School Student Suspended Indefinitely and Forced to Sit '8 hours/day on a stool' because of his Hairstyle.
Darryl George, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, Texas has been serving an ongoing suspension for 2 weeks because his hair is "too long". The school confines him to a small cubicle at a desk on a stool.
"He has to sit on a stool for eight hours in a cubicle, his mother said. Thats very uncomfortable. Every day hed come home, hed say his back hurts because he has to sit on a stool.
This young man is being kept from learning because the school says that they don't allow boys to have hair that extends under their eyebrows or ear lobes. His hair is always pulled up like you see here.
Note that Texas just passed a law that outlawed racial discrimination based on hairstyles
Link to tweet
?s=20
A Black student was suspended for his hairstyle. The school says it wasnt discrimination
https://apnews.com/article/hairstyles-dreadlocks-racial-discrimination-crown-act-034a59b9f2652881470dc606b39e5243
By Cheyanne Mumphrey and JUAN LOZANO
Updated 3:30 PM CDT, September 18, 2023
MONT BELVIEU, Texas (AP) A Black high school student in Texas has served more than two weeks of in-school suspensions for wearing twisted dreadlocks to school. When he arrived Monday with the same hairstyle, he was suspended again, his mother said.
Darryl George, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, was initially suspended the same week his state outlawed racial discrimination based on hairstyles. School officials said his dreadlocks fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes and violated the districts dress code.
George, 17, has been suspended since Aug. 31 at the Houston-area school.......................
.............................
................................
The law, an acronym for Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair, is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, dreadlocks, twists or Bantu knots. Texas is one of 24 states that have enacted a version of the CROWN Act.
A federal version of the CROWN Act passed in the House of Representatives last year, but was not successful in the Senate.
RELATED COVERAGE
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signs Crown Act legislation on Thursday, June 15, 2023 in Lansing, Mich. that will outlaw race-based hairstyle discrimination in workplaces and schools. State Sen. Sarah Anthony, far right, has pushed for the legislation since 2019. (AP Photo/Joey Cappelletti)
Michigan bans hairstyle discrimination in workplaces and schools
McKenzie Johnson, a Cibola High School student who is Navajo, speaks at an Albuquerque Public Schools Native American Open Community Forum in 2019 in Albuquerque, N.M., in recalling a cultural assault incident that happened to her at school and pushing for changes in the district. An appeals court ruling has revived an anti-discrimination lawsuit accusing an Albuquerque teacher of cutting off one Native American girl's hair and asking another, Johnson, if she was dressed as a bloody Indian during class on Halloween. (Shelby Perea/The Albuquerque Journal via AP)
Rights upheld, lawsuit revived against teacher accused of cutting Native American students hair
prodigitalson
(3,193 posts)TygrBright
(21,362 posts)Seriously. Go look at the picture. It is neat, it is off the face, well-groomed, clean, dare I even say attractive, as hairstyles go? Elegant, anyway.
The ONLY thing about it that any racist asshole could possibly object to is the color of the skin under it.
Back when the dinos roamed the suburbs of my childhood, you'd get turfed for persistently "messy" hair, including persons with Y chromosomes wearing too much 'product' or wearing the hair too long, persons without Y chromosomes with too much ratting in their bouffant, etcetera, and there was a kind of stupid logic to it... it could be distracting, to worry about whether the grease would drip down onto yer desk from the kid sitting in front of you, or whether whatever was nesting in Betty Jean's bouff mightn't find its way onto you somehow.
But this? Dayum, the only distraction is a sigh of admiration.
And that should never be cause for disciplinary action.
Dumb arseholes.
disgustedly,
Bright
twodogsbarking
(18,785 posts)Oh wait.............
catrose
(5,365 posts)Or past his shoulders. Its very neat. And as for the principal who thinks students should make sacrifices for the common good
1. How does that even apply here?
2. What was principals attitude towards masks for the last 3 years?