Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LymphocyteLover

(5,662 posts)
Sun Nov 12, 2023, 10:36 AM Nov 2023

With the world on fire, a cowardly, timid news media is a threat to U.S. democracy

By Will Bunch

"There was a shocking and incredibly important story on the front page of the New York Times last week. As reported by an A-team of journalists including two Pulitzer Prize winners, the Times warned its readers that Donald Trump — if returned to the White House in 2025 — is grooming a new team of extremist government lawyers who would be more loyal to their Dear Leader than to the rule of law, and could help Trump install a brand of American fascism.

You say you didn’t hear anything about this? That’s not surprising. The editors at the Times made sure to present this major report in the blandest, most inoffensive way possible — staying true to the mantra in the nation’s most influential newsroom that the 2024 election shouldn’t be covered any differently, even when U.S. democracy is on the line.

“Trump Allies Want a New Style of Lawyer if He Returns to Power” was the original online headline for the piece, as if maybe they were talking about colorful drawling Southerners with seersucker suits, rather than rabid-dog ideologues who would do the dirty work of overturning an election that career government attorneys refused to do before Jan. 6, 2021.

That “new style of lawyer” — pro-Trump, “America First” zealots who think the ultraconservative lawyers bred in the Federalist Society are too soft to carry out their leader’s autocratic call for a “final battle” against traditional democratic governance that he calls “the deep state” — was described, numbingly, by the Times as “more aggressive legal gatekeepers.” Their dangerous antidemocratic mission was blandly outlined as a plan to “take control of the government in a way unseen in presidential history.”"

https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/commentary/journalism-free-press-gaza-extremism-20231105.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With the world on fire, a cowardly, timid news media is a threat to U.S. democracy (Original Post) LymphocyteLover Nov 2023 OP
We need professional journalism that is not in service to corporate and commercial editorial oversight. hay rick Nov 2023 #1
..who will pay the journalists? Paywalls collect revenue so the journalism can occur nt ramen Nov 2023 #2
Thanks for the gift article. hay rick Nov 2023 #4
Democratic "bedwetting" wryter2000 Nov 2023 #3
US media isn't "liberal" ... nor is it cowardly or timid ... FakeNoose Nov 2023 #5

hay rick

(7,648 posts)
1. We need professional journalism that is not in service to corporate and commercial editorial oversight.
Sun Nov 12, 2023, 11:21 AM
Nov 2023

Full article is behind a paywall.

ramen

(792 posts)
2. ..who will pay the journalists? Paywalls collect revenue so the journalism can occur nt
Sun Nov 12, 2023, 12:52 PM
Nov 2023

I think this is the article in question, here it is as a gift article

If Trump Wins, His Allies Want Lawyers Who Will Bless a More Radical Agenda https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/01/us/politics/trump-2025-lawyers.html?unlocked_article_code=1.90w.UhoX.1x7ZIVZ1ORtl&smid=nytcore-android-share

hay rick

(7,648 posts)
4. Thanks for the gift article.
Sun Nov 12, 2023, 01:27 PM
Nov 2023

I am not complaining about pay walls. My complaint is that the media companies that employ journalists have the ability to decide what stories their paid employees cover and often, how those stories are covered. Editorial control of the limited resource of competent, professional journalism is both necessary and problematic.

Liberal democracy is supposed to feature a "marketplace of ideas"- but the existing American marketplace of ideas is perverted by the need to sell prescription drugs, to make the world safe for oil wells, and a host of other profit-seeking enterprises which may or may not be compatible with democracy and the welfare of the people.

wryter2000

(46,099 posts)
3. Democratic "bedwetting"
Sun Nov 12, 2023, 01:07 PM
Nov 2023

I've come to believe that Dems are anxiety ridden all the time because we have to suffer this crap from the media. We're not timid folks. We're being abused.

FakeNoose

(32,826 posts)
5. US media isn't "liberal" ... nor is it cowardly or timid ...
Sun Nov 12, 2023, 07:05 PM
Nov 2023

... it's BOUGHT AND PAID FOR by the conservative owners and executive boards.

We'd be kidding ourselves to think that beat reporters are allowed to express their own relatively "liberal" opinions on newspaper articles or television stories. They don't get published, they don't get on the air when they express liberal progressive views - they get FIRED.

The owners and executives of major city newspapers and TV and cable news stations are all or mostly one-per-centers. Their annual salaries and perks are usually more than 100 times what the beat reporters make per year. Most of them think just like Chump, and as far as they're concerned he's the greatest thing since sliced bread.

The lawyers in the US are either making $1 million per year, or if they aren't, they assume they will be in the next 5 years. They all relate to the same conservative "logic" as the bankers, accountants and executives. The deck is totally stacked against Democrats, liberals and progressives.





Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»With the world on fire, a...