Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 03:47 PM Jan 2013

RAVITCH: If teachers can divest from guns why not corporations killing public schools?

I'm the reader who sent the email she quotes.

I don't currently have the connections or time to make this happen, but I'm going to try.


Time to Divest?
by Diane Ravitch

A reader sent along a story that the California teachers' pension fund, the second largest in the nation, has decided to divest from corporations that manufactures weapons.

That's a good start. Now how about divesting in Walmart, which is the biggest retail outlet for assault weapons like the one used in the Newtown massacre? Another reason to divest in Walmart is that the Walton family is one of the biggest sponsors of vouchers and charters--all non-union--of course. Why should teachers invest in corporations that want to cut their pay, eliminate their job security, tie their profession to unreliable test scores, and break their union (if they have one)?

Teachers often act powerless but in fact their pension funds wield a lot of power in the marketplace. Others use their economic power to attack public education. Why shouldn't teachers and administrators use their economic power to defend this citadel of democracy?

The reader asked the following question:

Why can't we ask our retirement funds to divest from at least those companies that directly profit from the corporate education reform movement, like testing companies, education management companies, and the for profit charter companies?

Another way to get at the same effect is to move districts and states toward open source textbooks and testing, that are developed by educators collaborating and offered to schools at minimal cost. The state of California passed a law setting up a project to do this at the college level for the most commonly used course textbooks. I can't imagine collaboratively developed tests would be as expensive as the corporate ones, and politicians would have a hard time arguing against the cost savings as well.

We need to stop giving money to companies that are slowly strangling our public schools.


dianerav | January 13, 2013 at 4:56 pm | Categories: Education Reform |

FULL TEXT
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RAVITCH: If teachers can divest from guns why not corporations killing public schools? (Original Post) yurbud Jan 2013 OP
I'm going to write to my union tonight. We should have thought of this long ago. Thank you. Squinch Jan 2013 #1
which one? I'm in the AFT, and I'm going to look up who to contact to create some pressure there yurbud Jan 2013 #2
UFT, but a non-teacher chapter. Squinch Jan 2013 #3

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
2. which one? I'm in the AFT, and I'm going to look up who to contact to create some pressure there
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 09:21 PM
Jan 2013

and I'll try to find the analogous person in the NEA.

I'd like to put something together to go viral that's simple and just a couple of clicks for people to do.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»RAVITCH: If teachers can ...